Variation Formulations of Physical Laws: The Correct Formulation

AI Thread Summary
Variational forms are essential for modeling certain physical phenomena that cannot be accurately represented through local perspectives. Examples include phase transitions and certain aspects of electromagnetism, where the underlying microscopic behavior leads to discontinuities. These phenomena often involve complex interactions that smooth out at a macroscopic level, making variational methods necessary for accurate representation. Local views fail to capture the essential characteristics of these systems, leading to nonsensical results. Understanding these limitations highlights the importance of variational approaches in continuum physics.
JTVT
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Source of Question
J.N. Reddy states in Finite Element Method: "Variational forms of the laws of continuum physics may be the only natural and rigorously correct way to think of them. While all sufficiently smooth fields lead to meaningful variational forms, the converse is not true: There exists physical phenomena which can be adequately modeled mathematically only in a variational setting; they are nonsensical when viewed locally"

My Question
What are some examples of physical phenomena that can be adequately modeled mathematically only in a variational setting and why are they nonsensical when viewed locally?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Some approaches are "mean field theories" which result in very smooth fields - Maxwell's equations in matter are an example. But when you look at the microscopic sources of the fields (atoms and molecules, etc) their appear to be discontinuities ... hence you cannot meet the usual requirements for differentiability so that you can carry out the variational principle.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top