Variation of chemical potential with T and P

  • Thread starter Urmi Roy
  • Start date
  • #1
753
1

Main Question or Discussion Point

So the expression for Gibb's free energy is:

dG = -SdT + VdP + μdN,

Here, we see that the Gibb's free energy changes with temperature (dT), change in pressure (dP) and change in chemical potential (as a result of change in particle number).

My question is: we know chemical potential varies with both change in temperature and pressure. So if we don't add/remove particles from the system, the chemical potential does change with variation of P and T...so is that already included in the above equation?

(That is, in the above equation, are we accounting for the change in Gibb's free energy as a result of change in chemical potential as a result of variation of T and P, in addition to the change in chemical potential due to change in particle number).

Further, when the number of particles changes, there might be a number of chemical reactions that take place, so the temperature T might change because of that also, which would change the sdT term at the beginning, right?

I guess I'm just having problems understanding chemical potential :-/
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
20,145
4,215
So the expression for Gibb's free energy is:

dG = -SdT + VdP + μdN,

Here, we see that the Gibb's free energy changes with temperature (dT), change in pressure (dP) and change in chemical potential (as a result of change in particle number).

My question is: we know chemical potential varies with both change in temperature and pressure. So if we don't add/remove particles from the system, the chemical potential does change with variation of P and T...so is that already included in the above equation?

(That is, in the above equation, are we accounting for the change in Gibb's free energy as a result of change in chemical potential as a result of variation of T and P, in addition to the change in chemical potential due to change in particle number).



Further, when the number of particles changes, there might be a number of chemical reactions that take place, so the temperature T might change because of that also, which would change the sdT term at the beginning, right?

I guess I'm just having problems understanding chemical potential :-/
The answer to all your questions is "yes", the equation for dG takes all these things into account. The Gibbs Free Energy G can be expressed as a function of T, P, and N1, ..., Nm, where m is the number of species in the solution:

[tex]G=G(T,P,N_1,...,N_m)[/tex]

An infinitecimal change in G can be represented using the chain rule for partial differentiation:

[tex]dG=\frac{\partial G}{\partial T}dT+\frac{\partial G}{\partial P}dP+\frac{\partial G}{\partial N_1}dN_1+...+\frac{\partial G}{\partial N_m}dN_m[/tex]
Each of the partial derivatives in this equation is a function of T, P, and the N's, with
[tex]\frac{\partial G}{\partial T}=-S[/tex]
[tex]\frac{\partial G}{\partial P}=V[/tex]
and
[tex]\frac{\partial G}{\partial N_i}=μ_i[/tex]

I hope this helps.
 
  • #3
DrDu
Science Advisor
6,032
759
Of course mu is a function of T and P, also.
Given that ##\mu=\partial G/\partial N## we have ##(\partial\mu /\partial T)_P=\partial^2 G/\partial N \partial T=\partial^2 G /\partial T \partial N =-(\partial S/\partial N)_P = S_m## i.e. the partial molar entropy and analogously
##(\partial \mu/\partial P)_T=V_m ## the partial molar volume.
So for fixed N, ##d\mu=-S_mdT+V_m dP##
 
  • Like
Likes pallab
  • #4
753
1
Can I just go on to ask what the difference between chemical potential and chemical affinity is? They seem to , intuitively, mean the same thing but chemical potential is +ve for a reaction that's progressing and affinity is negative!

Also, is A (affinity) always the same sign as the rate of reaction?
 
  • #5
DrDu
Science Advisor
6,032
759
##A=-\Delta G_r=-\sum \nu_i \mu_i##
were ##\nu_i## are the stochiometric coefficients of the reaction taking place.
So basically A is a weighed sum of chemical potentials.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person

Related Threads on Variation of chemical potential with T and P

Replies
2
Views
668
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
12K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
910
Top