Vector Analysis for Minimum Temperature on a Curve: Solve with Grad(p) Method

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the point on a specified curve where a temperature function reaches its minimum value, using vector methods and the gradient of the temperature function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of the gradient and its relationship to finding extrema, with one suggesting the method of Lagrange multipliers. There is also exploration of substituting curve parameters into the temperature function to find minima.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into using the gradient and its implications for finding minimum points, while others express confusion about parameter selection and the complexity of the problem. There is acknowledgment of the need for numerical methods in more complicated scenarios.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of visualizing the relationship between the curve and the temperature function, as well as the potential for varying complexity in similar problems.

EngageEngage
Messages
203
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



By vector methods, find the point on the curve x = t, y = t^2, z = 2 at which the temperature p(x,y,z) = x^2 - 6x + y^2 takes its minimum value

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


As far as I got was finding grad(p). From there I'm not sure where to go -- If I take the magnitude of grad(p) i can find the maximum at any point in space, but how to find the minimum I have no clue. I'm also just having trouble visualizing what exactly is being asked and how a curve and the surface relate to a physical quantity like the temperature. If anyone could help me out that would be much appreciated. Thanks a lot
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe this calls for the method of Lagrange multipliers?
 
If r(t) is your curve, the 'vector' way is to find points where r'(t).grad(p)=0. Do you see why? grad(p) points in direction of steepest change for p, the direction normal to that is the derivative 0 direction. The direct way to do it is just to substitute the r(t) coordinate values into p, and then find the minimum as a function of t. Try is both ways. Algebraically they are identical.
 
doing that i get the following:

grad(p) = <2x - 6, 2y, 0>
dr/dt = <1, 2t, 0>

grad(p) . dr/dt = 2x - 6 + 4ty = 0.

From this i see that the point where this is true is (1,1,2) with t = 1, which is the right answer. However, I am still somewhat confused because I have no clue how I would pick a correct value for the parameter given a more complicated situation since I chose it because it was trivial. I feel like i just got lucky in picking the correct answer. Is there a more "algorithmic" way to do this? Thank you for all the help!
 
In a more complicated situation, the situation is more complicated. Then you might have to resort to numerical methods instead of just guessing the answer. That's life. It can be complicated. This is an exercise. It's not complicated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K