Vector calculus -line integral

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a line integral in vector calculus, specifically concerning the vector field F(r) = (x^2)y i + 2yz j + 9(z^2)x k. The original poster seeks to evaluate the integral of F along a path from the origin (0,0,0) to the point (1,2,3), questioning the implications of whether F represents a conservative force.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand how to evaluate the line integral and whether the vector field is conservative. Some participants suggest checking the curl of F to determine conservativeness, while others discuss the implications of F being conservative or non-conservative on the need to perform the line integral.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring various interpretations of the problem. There is a focus on the nature of the vector field and the relevance of the path taken in the line integral. Some guidance has been offered regarding the setup of the integral and the conditions under which the integral may be simplified.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem does not specify the path taken to (1,2,3), which raises questions about the assumptions made regarding the vector field's properties. The original poster also acknowledges missing information in their initial statement, which has been clarified in subsequent posts.

Outrageous
Messages
373
Reaction score
0
Vector calculus ---line integral

Homework Statement



If vector F(r)= (x^2)y i + 2yz j + 9(z^2)x k , find ∫ vector F dot vector dr between (0,0,0) and (1,2,3)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


If I want to find work done, then I just use F dot dr in this case , in F act in the direction of r, then I will get the answer in term of x y z, then substitute x=1, y=2, z=3 to get the work done.
But for this case, it didnt say it is work done, so still have to do ∫F dot dr , ∫Fdxi+∫Fdyj+∫Fdzk , then ∫Fdxi from x=0 to x=1 by keeping y and z constant, then what should I substitute to my y and z ?


Please help.
Thank you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If the F here is force, then is it a conservative or non conservative force??
 
Are you sure you wrote everything in the problem statement? You can determine whether F is conservative or not by taking the curl of F and seeing if it vanishes.
 
Whether F is "conservative" or not, even whether it is a force, is unknown and irrelevant. If you knew this were a "conservative force" (in physics language- a "total differential" in mathematics) you would not have to do the line integral but here you are told to do it. The line from (0, 0, 0) to (1, 2, 3) (how original!) is given by x= t, y= 2t, z= 3t, as t goes from 0 to 1. The vector differential is [itex](\vec{i}+ 2\vec{j}+ 3\vec{k}) dt[/itex]. Take the dot product of that with [itex]x^2y \vec{i} + 2yz \vec{j}j + 9z^2x \vec{j}[/itex] and integrate.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
CAF123 said:
Are you sure you wrote everything in the problem statement? You can determine whether F is conservative or not by taking the curl of F and seeing if it vanishes.

I forget to write straight line c from (0,0,0) to (1,2,3)!
then I can define x=t, y=2t, z=3t, I know how to do already, thank you.

∇ cross F ,then I get -2yi-(3z^2)j-(x^2)k, so it is non conservative force.
Why it is conservative force will vanish?
 
HallsofIvy said:
Whether F is "conservative" or not, even whether it is a force, is unknown and irrelevant. If you knew this were a "conservative force" (in physics language- a "total differential" in mathematics) you would not have to do the line integral but here you are told to do it. The line from (0, 0, 0) to (1, 2, 3) (how original!) is given by x= t, y= 2t, z= 3t, as t goes from 0 to 1. The vector differential is [itex](\vec{i}+ 2\vec{j}+ 3\vec{k}) dt[/itex]. Take the dot product of that with [itex]x^2y \vec{i} + 2yz \vec{j}j + 9z^2x \vec{j}[/itex] and integrate.

If the path was closed and F conservative, then they wouldn't ask to do the integral. However, the question gives no information about what path we take to (1,2,3) from O. For example, it may be a helix or it may be a straight line. In the case that F was conservative then you could take any path, however it turns out F is not conservative so that is why I wondered if something was missing from OP.

EDIT: The OP has clarified this issue in the above post.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Outrageous said:
Why is conservative force will vanish?

If F is a conservative force, we may associate a potential, that is ##\mathbf{F} = \nabla f##, where ##f## is the potential function for ##\mathbf{F}##. Now take the curl: $$\nabla \times \mathbf{F} = \nabla \times ( \nabla f ) = \mathbf{0}$$ since we have a curl-grad which is always zero.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Whether F is "conservative" or not, even whether it is a force, is unknown and irrelevant. If you knew this were a "conservative force" (in physics language- a "total differential" in mathematics) you would not have to do the line integral but here you are told to do it. The line from (0, 0, 0) to (1, 2, 3) (how original!) is given by x= t, y= 2t, z= 3t, as t goes from 0 to 1. The vector differential is [itex](\vec{i}+ 2\vec{j}+ 3\vec{k}) dt[/itex]. Take the dot product of that with [itex]x^2y \vec{i} + 2yz \vec{j}j + 9z^2x \vec{j}[/itex] and integrate.

Thank you. if it is conservative force, then the path of the work done will not important already, so that is why you said no need to do line integral.
can you please explain more about the total differetial in math mean? total differential of the force? normally if total differential will get what ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
CAF123 said:
If F is a conservative force, we may associate a potential, that is ##\mathbf{F} = \nabla f##, where ##f## is the potential function for ##\mathbf{F}##. Now take the curl: $$\nabla \times \mathbf{F} = \nabla \times ( \nabla f ) = \mathbf{0}$$ since we have a curl-grad which is always zero.

##\mathbf{F} = \nabla f##, where ##f## is the potential function for ##\mathbf{F}##.
F is the rate of change of the potential energy ,
then $$\nabla \times ( \nabla f ) = \mathbf{0}$$
if it equal to zero ,will prove that the F have potential function , so it is conservative force. is it??
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Outrageous said:
##\mathbf{F} = \nabla f##, where ##f## is the potential function for ##\mathbf{F}##.
F is the rate of change of the potential energy ,
then $$\nabla \times ( \nabla f ) = \mathbf{0}$$
if it equal to zero ,will prove that the F have potential function , so it is conservative force. is it??

Yes, you can easily prove that curl-grad is always zero for general ##f##.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K