Vector calculus, surfaces, and planes.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on finding the vector equation r(x) for the intersection of a plane and a surface defined by the equations y + 2x = 0 and z = 3x^3 - y^2 + 2x + 2y. The user initially substituted the plane equation into the surface equation, resulting in a function of x, f(x) = -x^2 - 2x. The correct approach involves using the vector parameterization of the surface, specifically R(x,y) = ⟨x, y, 3x^3 - y^2 + 2x + 2y⟩, and substituting y = -2x to derive the required curve. Understanding the parameterization of surfaces is crucial for determining the tangent vector equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus concepts, particularly parameterization of surfaces.
  • Familiarity with equations of planes and surfaces in three-dimensional space.
  • Knowledge of differentiation techniques for vector functions.
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions involving multiple variables.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study vector parameterization techniques for surfaces in three-dimensional space.
  • Learn how to derive tangent vectors from vector equations in calculus.
  • Explore examples of intersections between planes and surfaces in vector calculus.
  • Investigate the implications of different parameterizations on the geometry of surfaces.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying vector calculus, as well as educators looking for examples of surface parameterization and intersection analysis.

PhysicsKid0123
Messages
95
Reaction score
1
I have attached an image... Okay, so I have been stuck on this problem for like 2 hours now and I have no idea how to find r(x). I know the trace is the intersection of the plane and the surface. My first attempt was to substitute the plane y+2x=0 equation for the surface equation by solving for y getting y=-2x. So I got 3x^2-(-2x)^2+2x+2(-2x) = z = f(x,y).
So I got an equation which is only a function of x e.g f(x) = -x^2-2x. However, how do I go from this to a vector equation r(x) so I can differentiate to get the tangent vector equation.
 

Attachments

  • sgdg5.JPG
    sgdg5.JPG
    7.8 KB · Views: 441
Physics news on Phys.org
PhysicsKid0123 said:
I have attached an image... Okay, so I have been stuck on this problem for like 2 hours now and I have no idea how to find r(x). I know the trace is the intersection of the plane and the surface. My first attempt was to substitute the plane y+2x=0 equation for the surface equation by solving for y getting y=-2x. So I got 3x^2-(-2x)^2+2x+2(-2x) = z = f(x,y).
So I got an equation which is only a function of x e.g f(x) = -x^2-2x. However, how do I go from this to a vector equation r(x) so I can differentiate to get the tangent vector equation.

You could use the vector parameterization of the surface ##x = x, y = y, z = 3x^3 - y^2 +2x+2y## so for the surface$$
\vec R(x,y) = \langle x,y,3x^3 - y^2 +2x+2y\rangle$$Now put ##y = -2x## in that and you will have a vector equation for the required curve.

[Edit] Fixed typo in parameterization ##x^2## should have been ##x^3##.
 
Last edited:
LCKurtz said:
You could use the vector parameterization of the surface ##x = x, y = y, z = 3x^3 - y^2 +2x+2y## so for the surface$$
\vec R(x,y) = \langle x,y,3x^2 - y^2 +2x+2y\rangle$$Now put ##y = -2x## in that and you will have a vector equation for the required curve.
okay, I haven't solved it yet using what you've told me, but why would that work? How would I know if using x and not x^2 or 4x would be the correct parametrization? Just seems arbitrary how your define the position vector of the surface. mhmmm...
 
PhysicsKid0123 said:
okay, I haven't solved it yet using what you've told me, but why would that work? How would I know if using x and not x^2 or 4x would be the correct parametrization? Just seems arbitrary how your define the position vector of the surface. mhmmm...

Parameterizations of surfaces need two variables. Since ##z## is given in terms of ##x## and ##y##, it is most natural to use them as the parameters.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K