Vector Cross Product: Calculating -i x i = 0?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the vector cross product, specifically the calculation of -i x i and its implications. Participants are exploring the properties of vector operations in the context of linear algebra.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions the result of the cross product -i x i, considering whether it yields -1 or 0. Some participants discuss the properties of cross products, particularly the result of a vector crossed with itself. Others introduce a related topic about vector projections, leading to a clarification of terms used.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into vector properties and correcting terminology. There is a recognition of the distinction between cross products and dot products, indicating a productive exploration of the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through potential misunderstandings regarding vector operations, particularly in distinguishing between cross and dot products. The original poster's question about the cross product is linked to a broader discussion on vector projections, which may introduce additional complexity to the topic.

Ry122
Messages
563
Reaction score
2
What is the cross product of -i x i? Is it negative 1 or is still just 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that for any 2 vectors a,b: -a x b = -(a x b). This reduces the problem to -(i x i).

Now what is the vector product of a vector with itself?
 
well can you tell me how the projection of u on to v
where
u=-i+2j and v=i+2j is
v=(3/5)i+(6/5)j ?
The answer i got was (4/5)i + (8/5)j
i used the equation
w=v.((u.v)/(modulusv^2))
 
Ry122 said:
i used the equation
w=v.((u.v)/(modulusv^2))
This equation for the projection is

[tex]\mathbf w = \mathbf v \frac {\mathbf u \cdot \mathbf v}{v^2}[/tex]

Note well: The cross product is not involved when you compute the projection this way.
 
That's the same equation that I gave. yeah i realized my mistake after posting, i should have said dot product, not cross product.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K