Vector (i-j=k): Why Does MA=i+j+k?

  • Thread starter Thread starter desmond iking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vector
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the vector expression MA and its relation to the vectors (i-j) and (i+j). Participants are exploring the properties of vector operations, particularly cross products, in the context of vector algebra.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants attempt to clarify the transformation of the vector MA into (i+j+k) and question the correctness of the initial assumptions regarding the vector operations involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing differing viewpoints on the calculations and interpretations of vector products. Some have offered alternative calculations and expressed disagreement with previous assertions, indicating a lack of consensus on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the application of vector operations and the assumptions made about the vectors involved. The original poster's understanding of the transformation from (i-j) to k is being questioned, and there are references to specific vector identities and magnitudes that may not be fully clarified.

desmond iking
Messages
284
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


I can't understand why the vector MA finally become (i+j+k) ?? is it beacuse of (i-j ) becomes k ??

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • kgk.png
    kgk.png
    46.4 KB · Views: 1,139
Physics news on Phys.org
That's wrong!
<br /> (i-j)\times (i+j)=\underbrace{i\times i}_0+i \times j- j\times i-\underbrace{ j \times j}_0=i\times j+i\times j=2 i \times j=2 k<br />
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: desmond iking
Shyan said:
That's wrong!
<br /> (i-j)\times (i+j)=\underbrace{i\times i}_0+i \times j- j\times i-\underbrace{ j \times j}_0=i\times j+i\times j=2 i \times j=2 k<br />
It's wrong before that, even.
##\vec P = P(\vec j -\vec k)/\sqrt 2##
Alternatively, by calculating the distance from A to the line of P the moment is seen to have magnitude ##aP\sqrt {\frac 32}##. I believe the correct answer is exactly half that shown.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: theodoros.mihos and desmond iking
-j X i=k
That k and the other normal one from i x j=k, add up to 2k.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K