Calculating Midpoint of Vector AB | Precalc Homework Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mathematicsss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vector
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the midpoint of the vector AB, where points A(3,2,5) and B(1,3,2) are given. Participants are exploring the concepts of vectors and midpoints in a three-dimensional context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the method of finding the midpoint by subtracting the coordinates of points A and B and dividing by two. Questions arise about the validity of this approach and its relation to finding midpoints in general.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the definitions and methods related to midpoints and vectors. Some participants suggest that the original question may be poorly worded, leading to confusion about whether it is asking for the midpoint of a vector or the midpoint between two points. Clarifications are being sought regarding the mathematical reasoning behind the midpoint calculation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original problem statement may lack clarity, particularly in distinguishing between finding the midpoint of a vector and the midpoint between two points. There is also a discussion about the implications of different interpretations of the problem.

Mathematicsss
Mod note: Moved to Precalc section

Homework Statement


Find the midpoint of the vector AB[/B]
A(3,2,5) B(1,3,2)

Homework Equations


Not sure

The Attempt at a Solution


I wrote each point in terms of the unit vectors, i,j,k then I subtracted the two, and divided by a 2.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Mathematicsss said:
I wrote each point in terms of the unit vectors, i,j,k then I subtracted the two, and divided by a 2.
In the future, please do not just describe what you did. Show us what you did and what result you got.

Now. Why did you take the difference and divide by two? Why do you think that will give you the midpoint? If you think just about real numbers, say 4 and 10, which number is the midpoint between those and do you get it by taking (10-4)/2?
 
Orodruin said:
In the future, please do not just describe what you did. Show us what you did and what result you got.

Now. Why did you take the difference and divide by two? Why do you think that will give you the midpoint? If you think just about real numbers, say 4 and 10, which number is the midpoint between those and do you get it by taking (10-4)/2?
Because vector AB is point B relative to A, and so I subtracted the two to find the new point, and then wrote the new point in the form of i,j and k unit vectors. I then divided in order to the midpoint of the the new vector. However, I am not sure why it is that it doesn't work with the numbers you wrote (4 and 10), can you please explain?
 
Mathematicsss said:
Because vector AB is point B relative to A, and so I subtracted the two to find the new point, and then wrote the new point in the form of i,j and k unit vectors.
This gives you the difference vector between A and B, not the midpoint. Consider the case when A and B are the same point, you would get zero.

What would you do to mathematically find the midpoint between 4 and 10?
Edit: It is obviously 7, but how do you reach this conclusion?
 
Orodruin said:
This gives you the difference vector between A and B, not the midpoint. Consider the case when A and B are the same point, you would get zero.

What would you do to mathematically find the midpoint between 4 and 10?
Edit: It is obviously 7, but how do you reach this conclusion?
To find the midpoint between 4 and 10, I add 4+10 and divide by 2.
 
Mathematicsss said:
To find the midpoint between 4 and 10, I add 4+10 and divide by 2.
So why are you not doing the same for your problem?
 
Orodruin said:
So why are you not doing the same for your problem?
Oh, I see.
 
Orodruin said:
So why are you not doing the same for your problem?
I have another question, to write A(3,2,5) as a position vector, it would be 3i+2j+5k correct?
 
Assuming that the (3,2,5) are the Cartesian coordinates, yes.
 
  • #10
Orodruin said:
Assuming that the (3,2,5) are the Cartesian coordinates, yes.
What if I was asked just to find the position vector AB?
 
  • #11
AB is not a position vector, it is a difference vector.
 
  • #12
Orodruin said:
AB is not a position vector, it is a difference vector.
Yes, I know.. I meant that what if we were supposed to find a position vector, AB, is that possible? and what if I wrote AB (difference vector) in the form of I,j, and k? wouldn't it be a position vector? Assuming A and B are cartesian coordinates?
 
  • #13
Mathematicsss said:
wouldn't it be a position vector?
No. It would only be a vector. The only thing that is a position vector is the vector from the origin to a given point. AB is not such a vector.
 
  • #14
Orodruin said:
No. It would only be a vector. The only thing that is a position vector is the vector from the origin to a given point. AB is not such a vector.
Alright, do you suggest that in order for myself to solve vector problems that are in R^3, it would be helpful to use an analogy in R^2?
 
  • #15
Orodruin said:
No. It would only be a vector. The only thing that is a position vector is the vector from the origin to a given point. AB is not such a vector.
last two questions, 1)if I added the two vectors are wrote them in I,j,and k, will I get a position vector?
2) Will there ever be a case where I will not be able to find the midpoint of AB?

Thank you very much, you have been very helpful. I apologise for taking much of your time. Have an amazing day!
 
  • #16
We need to be careful of the wording of the question. As stated, I think that the vector AB is (-1, 1/2, -3/2). That is the vector originating at (0,0,0). The vector from A to B is exactly the difference as stated in the OP and the midpoint of that vector is obtained as stated in the OP.

If the problem had asked for the midpoint of the line from A to B, I think that would be different. That would be (A+B)/2. Or if the question had asked for the vector from the origin to the midpoint between A and B, that would also be the vector from the origin to the point (A+B)/2 = A + (AB/2)

PS. I'm using bold to indicate vectors because I have never been able to consistently get the vector symbol to work.
 
  • #17
I don't think the question in the OP is very well worded. I suspect it might not be stated exactly as given.

In my mind it does not make sense to ask for the "midpoint" of a vector. You only ask for the midpoint between to given points. If I wanted half the distance vector between the points, I would ask for half of AB. I suspect the problem might have come with a figure indicating AB as the vector from A to B. In that case, the midpoint of the vector would indeed be the midpoint between A and B. Without further specification and the problem stated exactly as given, we simply do not know.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
  • #18
Orodruin said:
I don't think the question in the OP is very well worded. I suspect it might not be stated exactly as given.
I agree.
In my mind it does not make sense to ask for the "midpoint" of a vector. You only ask for the midpoint between to given points. If I wanted half the distance vector between the points, I would ask for half of AB.
Good point.
I suspect the problem might have come with a figure indicating AB as the vector from A to B. In that case, the midpoint of the vector would indeed be the midpoint between A and B. Without further specification and the problem stated exactly as given, we simply do not know.
I agree. It's unfortunate that the wording is so treacherous.
 
  • #19
FactChecker said:
PS. I'm using bold to indicate vectors because I have never been able to consistently get the vector symbol to work.

Try ##\vec A##. It will render as ##\vec A##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
  • #20
LCKurtz said:
Try ##\vec A##. It will render as ##\vec A##.
Thanks. After some experimenting, I see that it was when I tried to use a bold letter as a vector that it didn't work for me:
Not bold: ##\vec A##
Bold: ##\vec A##
 
  • #21
When you insert a bold letter you are in actuality insertin BBcode into your LaTeX expression. If you want to make something bold in LaTeX, you must use LaTeX commands. But in general there is no need to make a vector bold and to have a vector arrow.
 
  • #22
Orodruin said:
I don't think the question in the OP is very well worded. I suspect it might not be stated exactly as given.

In my mind it does not make sense to ask for the "midpoint" of a vector. You only ask for the midpoint between to given points. If I wanted half the distance vector between the points, I would ask for half of AB. I suspect the problem might have come with a figure indicating AB as the vector from A to B. In that case, the midpoint of the vector would indeed be the midpoint between A and B. Without further specification and the problem stated exactly as given, we simply do not know.

The question is as follows: Find the position vector of the midpoint AB.
 
  • #23
Mathematicsss said:
The question is as follows: Find the position vector of the midpoint AB.
Aha! Yes, that is different and it is well defined. The midpoint of the line from point A to point B is at (A+B)/2 = ( (3+1)/2, (2+3)/2, (5+2)/2 ) = ( 2, 2.5, 3.5 ). And the vector to that point is based at (0,0,0) and denoted by ##\vec{( 2, 2.5, 3.5 )}##.

You can also get it by taking your vector of the OP, ##\vec{AB}##, and adding it to the position vector of point A.
##\vec A + \vec {AB} = \vec{(3,2,5)} + \vec{(-1,0.5,-1.5)} = \vec{(2,2.5,3.5)}##
 
Last edited:
  • #24
Orodruin said:
When you insert a bold letter you are in actuality insertin BBcode into your LaTeX expression. If you want to make something bold in LaTeX, you must use LaTeX commands. But in general there is no need to make a vector bold and to have a vector arrow.
Thanks. I also tried \textbf{}, which didn't work. Maybe I did it wrong. Anyway, I agree that it was not needed and I stopped trying.
 
  • #25
If I have to put bold stuff in equations, I usually use \boldsymbol instead. I think it looks much better as it uses an italic math font instead of text font - also it works for Greek letters. Here is the difference compared to using \textbf or {\bf }:
$$
\boldsymbol{a}\cdot\boldsymbol{\mu} = \textbf{a}\cdot \textbf{\mu} = {\bf a}\cdot{\bf \mu}
$$
Either way, I much prefer using \vec as it looks more similar to what you would write by hand and I think it is just confusing for students that we write things one way in typeset text and another on the blackboard.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
  • #26
FactChecker said:
Thanks. I also tried \textbf{}, which didn't work. Maybe I did it wrong. Anyway, I agree that it was not needed and I stopped trying.
The commands "\bf{x}" or "\mathbf{x}" both produce ##\bf{x}## and ##\mathbf{x}##. The commands "\mathbf{x}^2" and "\mathbf{x^2}" produce ##\mathbf{x}^2## and ##\mathbf{x^2}##, one of which has a bold superscript and the other not. The command \mathbf{x \times \alpha}" produces ##\mathbf{x \times \alpha}## (with bold ##\bf x## but non-bold ##\alpha## and non-bold ##\times##), while "\boldsymbol{x \times \alpha}" produces ##\boldsymbol{x \times \alpha}##, where everything is in bold.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K