Vector Projection Problem: Solving for Component in Given Direction

  • Thread starter Thread starter Allenman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Component Vector
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving for the component of a force vector \(\vec{F} = (70.0 \hat{i} + F_{y} \hat{j} + 140.0 \hat{k}) N\) in the direction of another vector \(\vec{P} = (6 \hat{i} - 3 \hat{j} - 2 \hat{k}) kN\), given that the component is +20.0 N. The professor clarified that no rotation of the coordinate system is necessary for this problem. The key to solving this problem lies in recognizing it as a vector projection issue, which involves using the projection formula to find the required component.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector notation and operations
  • Familiarity with vector projection concepts
  • Knowledge of force vectors in physics
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the vector projection formula and its applications
  • Practice problems involving force vectors and their components
  • Learn about coordinate systems and their transformations in vector analysis
  • Explore additional resources on vector operations in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering courses, particularly those studying mechanics, as well as educators looking to clarify vector projection concepts.

Allenman
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
This question was just given on a CEE 270 exam (handwritten by professor). The way it's written doesn't make any sense to me.

Homework Statement



A force vector
\vec{F} = (70.0 \hat{i} + F_{y} \hat{j} + 140.0 \hat{k} ) N​

has a component of +20.0 N in the direction defined by the vector
\vec{P} = (6 \hat{i} - 3 \hat{j} - 2 \hat{k} ) kN​

Solve for F_{y}.

The Attempt at a Solution



I asked the professor if I needed to rotate the coordinate system as the question states that a component of \vec{F} is in the \vec{P} direction. He said no rotation of the coordinate system should be needed.

I am very confused at how to even approach this problem. Please help. Does it even make sense?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem makes sense. When you want to know the projection of one vector onto another, what vector operation comes to mind?
 
Wow... I didn't recognize it as a vector projection problem... Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K