Vector Space, Two bases related by Unitary Matrix

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a vector space equipped with a hermitian scalar product and two orthonormal bases related by a unitary matrix. The original poster attempts to show that the matrix elements are given by the scalar products of the basis vectors and to demonstrate that the matrix is unitary.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster describes their approach to the first part of the problem, using scalar products to derive a relationship for the matrix elements. They express uncertainty about proving the unitarity of the matrix and seek guidance on how to show that the off-diagonal elements of the product of the matrix and its conjugate transpose are zero.
  • Some participants suggest leveraging the orthonormality of the second basis to aid in the proof, questioning how the inner product relationships can be utilized.
  • Others express confusion about the relevance of certain relationships and clarify their understanding of the basis vectors and the matrix U.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different aspects of the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of orthonormality, but there is no explicit consensus on the next steps or the resolution of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the relationship between the two bases is defined by the matrix U, and there is an emphasis on the implications of the orthonormality condition for the second basis. There is also mention of previous parts of the question that may not be directly relevant to the current discussion.

Zatman
Messages
85
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The vector space V is equipped with a hermitian scalar product and an orthonormal basis e1, ..., en. A second orthonormal basis, e1', ..., en' is related to the first one by

[itex]\mathbf{e}_j^{'}= \displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^n U_{ij}\mathbf{e}_i[/itex]

where Uij are complex numbers. Show that Uij = <ei, ej'>, and that the matrix U with entries Uij is unitary.

2. The attempt at a solution
I have done the first part, by simply taking the scalar product with some ek of each side of the defining equation for ej', and using the fact that each term is zero unless i=k, which leads to the first result.

I'm not quite sure how to go about the second part. I've attempted to show that UU* = I; but all I can see is that the diagonal elements of UU* are:

[itex]\displaystyle\sum_{j=1}^n \left\langle \mathbf{e}_i, \mathbf{e}_j^{'} \right\rangle ^2[/itex]

for i = 1:n. I think that this probably could be shown to be 1 for all i using the definition given.

I'm not sure how the remaining elements are going to be zero though, which is necessary for UU* = I.

Any nudges in the right direction would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't worked this out, so this is just a suggestion. It seems you haven't used the fact that the second basis is orthonormal yet. What do you get if you use the fact that ##\langle \mathbf{e}'_i, \mathbf{e}'_j \rangle = \delta_{ij}##?
 
Sorry, but I'm not sure how that can be used. The elements of U are scalar products of the ith basis vector and the jth primed basis vector, and the only relationship between the two bases is U itself.

What you wrote was used in a previous part of the question which I didn't bother typing out (it's not relevant to this part). Thank you, anyway.
 
U looks like a linear transformation that maps

[itex]e_i \ to \ e'_i[/itex], so it preserves scalar products.

Then show that <U*Ux.y> = <Ux.Uy> = <x.y>
 
Zatman said:
Sorry, but I'm not sure how that can be used. The elements of U are scalar products of the ith basis vector and the jth primed basis vector, and the only relationship between the two bases is U itself.

What you wrote was used in a previous part of the question which I didn't bother typing out (it's not relevant to this part). Thank you, anyway.
No, it wasn't. I wrote the inner product of ##e'_i## and ##e'_j##, both primed, not one primed and one unprimed.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K