Unitary Matrix mutually orthonormal vectors

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating that the columns of a unitary matrix form a set of mutually orthonormal vectors, with a focus on the relationship between the matrix and the identity matrix.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the hint provided, discussing the formation of vectors from the columns of the unitary matrix and the implications of the Kronecker delta in relation to the identity matrix.

Discussion Status

Some participants express confusion regarding the number of vectors and the notation used, while others suggest clarifying the meaning of orthonormality and the necessary conditions for the inner products of the vectors.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential missing steps in the proof and uncertainty about the interpretation of the results related to the original matrix being the identity.

physics2000
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Demonstrate that the columns of a unitary matrix form a set of mutually orthonormal vectors.

Homework Equations



hint - form the vectors u_i = {U_{ji}} and u_k={U_{jk}} from the i^{th} and j^{th} columns of U and make use of the relationship U^{\dagger}U=I

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought my work was following the hint...but not sure...I know I need to end up with an identity matrix from the hint, in which it shows the 3 columns are (1,0,0) , (0,1,0), and (0,0,1), respectively...to show that I have a set of basis vectors in the unitary matrix...

[url=http://postimage.org/][PLAIN]http://s9.postimage.org/sw7ugplvz/photo_3.jpg[/url] upload[/PLAIN]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like you've got it. The Kronecker delta symbol ## \delta_{jk} ## is 1 if j=k and 0 if j≠k. Doesn't that give you your identity matrix?
 
thanks,

I'm just a little confused because It looks like I only have one vector.

Do I need to turn that vector into a column, and for column 1 let i=k=1 , and for column 2 let i=k=3 and for column 3 let i=k=3, that would give:
[url=http://postimage.org/][PLAIN]http://s7.postimage.org/fj2bek7rf/photo_4.jpg[/url] free photo hosting[/PLAIN]

but I'm just not sure if my previous math boiled down to that, I feel like I'm missing something in the proof
 
thanks,

would this be the next step? I feel like my notation is wrong or I did something wrong in the process

[url=http://postimage.org/][PLAIN]http://s16.postimage.org/4f3mski91/photo_5.jpg[/url] upload pics[/PLAIN]
 
physics2000 said:
thanks,

would this be the next step? I feel like my notation is wrong or I did something wrong in the process

Yes, it's wrong. You want to show that the inner products (your sums) are 1 or 0. That's doesn't show that the original matrix U is the identity. What does 'orthonormal' mean?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K