Vectorial issue of friction

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the vectorial nature of frictional forces acting on a stationary object in a horizontal plane. The frictional force is defined as F (vector) = -mgμ j (unit), where μ represents the friction coefficient and N (vector) = -mg j (unit) is the normal force. The frictional force direction is always opposite to the direction of relative motion, necessitating a transformation from the j unit vector to the î unit vector. This transformation is not merely a convention but is derived from the fundamental laws of friction, which dictate that the frictional force is parallel to the surfaces in contact.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector notation and unit vectors
  • Knowledge of the laws of friction, including static and kinetic friction
  • Familiarity with normal force calculations in physics
  • Basic principles of mechanics involving forces and motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the laws of friction in detail, focusing on static and kinetic friction coefficients
  • Explore vector transformations in physics, particularly in mechanics
  • Review the implications of normal force on frictional forces in various scenarios
  • Investigate the relationship between frictional force and relative motion in different materials
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and professionals in engineering or mechanics who seek to deepen their understanding of frictional forces and their vectorial representations.

schrodingerwitch
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Considering an stopped object in a horizontal plane, the frictional force between the object and the plane would be the product of the friction coefficient (static or kinetic if there was movement between the surfaces) by normal. Since the normal in this case would be given by N (vector) = - mg j (unit), we would have the frictional force given by F (vector) = - mgμ j (unit).
But we know that the frictional force must act against the direction of the object's movement, so its unit vector must have direction î (unitary).

Is this change in the unit vector simply a convention that comes from agreement with experimental physics or is there some kind of vector transformation that makes this vector j^ already become a vector î?

The books I researched were Halliday, Tipler, Moysés and Young and Freedman. In none of them did I see comments about it, so I think it might be trivial, but I wanted to clear that doubt. The only book that talked about it was Alonso and Finn - A University Course, but it was just a comment and I found it confusing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
schrodingerwitch said:
Is this change in the unit vector simply a convention that comes from agreement with experimental physics or is there some kind of vector transformation that makes this vector j^ already become a vector î?
It's a consequence of the law of friction, where the resisting force of friction is in the direction of relative motion of the surfaces and depends on the magnitude of the normal force between the surfaces. The unit vectors are implied by and deduced from the law.
 
I'll restate what @PeroK just explained, but slightly differently.
schrodingerwitch said:
Considering an stopped object in a horizontal plane, the frictional force between the object and the plane would be the product of the friction coefficient (static or kinetic if there was movement between the surfaces) by normal. Since the normal in this case would be given by N (vector) = - mg j (unit), we would have the frictional force given by F (vector) = - mgμ j (unit).
No, the frictional force is not the product of the friction coefficient (a scalar) and the normal force (a vector) acting on the surface. (If so, the friction force would be perpendicular to the surface, as you note.) Instead, the magnitude of the friction force (for kinetic friction, at least) is given by the product of the friction coefficient (a scalar) and the magnitude of the normal force (another scalar).

The direction of the friction force (as @PeroK explained) always opposes the sliding between the surfaces and is parallel to those surfaces.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K