Verify Stoke's theorem for this surface

  • Thread starter Thread starter s3a
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Surface Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on verifying Stoke's theorem for a specific surface using the equation ∮_C F ⋅ dr = ∫∫_S (curl F) ⋅ n^ dS. The user seeks clarification on an integral involving |n^ ⋅ k^| in the denominator, which is part of the solution provided in the attached image. The solution involves the vector field F represented as (z^2 + x) i - (z + 3) k, and the parameterization of the surface is given by r(x,y) = x i + y j + 2 k. A transition to polar coordinates is suggested to simplify the calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically Stoke's theorem.
  • Familiarity with surface integrals and line integrals.
  • Knowledge of curl and normal vectors in three-dimensional space.
  • Ability to switch between Cartesian and polar coordinates in multivariable calculus.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Stoke's theorem in various contexts.
  • Learn how to compute curl for vector fields in three dimensions.
  • Practice converting integrals from Cartesian to polar coordinates.
  • Explore the geometric interpretation of line and surface integrals.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on vector calculus and multivariable calculus, as well as anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of Stoke's theorem and its applications.

s3a
Messages
828
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


The problem and its solution are attached in TheProblemAndSolution.jpg.

Homework Equations


Stoke's theorem: ∮_C F ⋅ dr = ∮_C (FT^) dS = ∫∫_S (curl F) ⋅ n^ dS

The Attempt at a Solution


In the solution attached in the TheProblemAndSolution.jpg file, I don't understand what's going on with the integral that has |n^k^| on a denominator.

Could someone please add the steps that are skipped by the solution?
 

Attachments

  • TheProblemAndSolution.jpg
    TheProblemAndSolution.jpg
    19 KB · Views: 545
Physics news on Phys.org
An easier way would be to say:

$$\oint_C \vec F \cdot d \vec r = \iint_S \text{curl}(\vec F) \cdot d \vec S = \iint_D \left[(z^2 + x) \hat i - (z+3) \hat k \right] \cdot (\vec r_x \times \vec r_y) \space dA = \iint_D \left[(4 + x) \hat i - 5 \hat k \right] \cdot (\vec r_x \times \vec r_y) \space dA$$

Where ##\vec r(x,y) = x \hat i + y \hat j + 2 \hat k##.

A simple switch to polar co-ordinates afterwards would clean that up nicely.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K