MHB How Can You Verify the Sum of Roots in a Quadratic Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To verify the sum of the roots in a quadratic equation ax^2 + bx + c = 0, the roots A and B can be expressed as A = (-b + √(b² - 4ac))/(2a) and B = (-b - √(b² - 4ac))/(2a). Adding these two roots results in the radicals canceling out, simplifying the expression to (-2b)/(2a). This further simplifies to -b/a, confirming the relationship A + B = -b/a. Thus, the theorem regarding the sum of the roots is logically verified through this process.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Let A and B be roots of the quadratic equation
ax^2 + bx + c = 0. Verify the statement.

A + B = -b/a

What are the steps to verify this statement?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
Let A and B be roots of the quadratic equation
ax^2 + bx + c = 0. Verify the statement.

A + B = -b/a

What are the steps to verify this statement?
There is a theorem for this, but let's do it logically. The two solutions, A and B of the quadratic are
[math]A = \frac{-b + \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}[/math] and [math]B = \frac{-b - \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}[/math]

Now add the two. (Hint: What happens to the radicals?)

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
There is a theorem for this, but let's do it logically. The two solutions, A and B of the quadratic are
[math]A = \frac{-b + \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}[/math] and [math]B = \frac{-b - \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}[/math]

Now add the two. (Hint: What happens to the radicals?)

-Dan

The radicals disappear. We are then left with (-2b)/(2a).
Of course, (-2b)/(2a) simplifies to -b/a.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top