Vertical Projectile Motion Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves vertical projectile motion, where a ball is projected upward with an initial velocity and subsequently strikes the ground after a specified time. Participants are tasked with determining the height of the building, the ball's height and velocity at specific times, and the time at which the ball's velocity reaches a certain value while descending.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of kinematic equations to calculate displacement and velocity at various times. Some question the assumptions made regarding the starting point and the total time of flight, while others explore different interpretations of the equations used.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing dialogue regarding the calculations and interpretations of the projectile motion equations. Some participants have provided calculations that align with the problem's requirements, while others express confusion about the time intervals and the implications of the equations used. Clarifications about the relationship between the time of flight and the height of the building are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of the initial height from which the ball is projected and how that affects the calculations. There is also discussion about the potential for multiple solutions in similar projectile motion problems.

TheRedDevil18
Messages
406
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



A ball is projected vertically upward with a velocity of 30m/s. It strikes the ground after 8's.

1.1) Determine the height of the building
1.2) Find the height of the ball relative to the ground as well as its velocity at t=3 and t=5
1.3) At what time will its velocity be 25m/s, downward?

Homework Equations



equations of motion

The Attempt at a Solution



1.1) Okay, I worked out the total time to go up and got 3's and then doubled it for coming down and got 6's (edge of the building). 8-6=2's coming down from top of the building.
delta y=vi*t+0.5*a*t^2
height of building = 79.6m

1.2) at t=3's, v=0
delta y = 45.9m
Relative to ground:
79.6+45.9=125.5m

at t=5's
vf = vi+at
= 0+(9.8)*5
= 49m/s - 30m/s
= 19m/s

delta y = 19.6m+79.6
= 99.2m relative to the ground

1.3) vf = vi+at
t = 2.55+3
= 5.55's

Could someone please check?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume it was thrown from the top of the building..

For 1) I used

S = ut + 0.5at^2

= 30*8 + 0.5(-9.8)82
= 240 - 313.6
= -73.6m

If you assume g = 10m/s/s then you get

= 240 - 320
= - 80m

-ve because it lands that distance below the height at which it was thrown from.
 
For 2)
t=3
S = ut + 0.5at^2
S = 30*3 + 0.5(-9.8)32
S = 90-44.1
S = 45.9m (above the top of the building)

Height above ground = 45.9 + 73.6 = 119.5m

Repeat with t=5

Edit: Gives 27.5 + 73.6 = 101.1m above ground.
 
Last edited:
For 3)

v = u + at

t = (v - u)/a

v=-25

t = (-25 - 30)/-9.8

= 5.6 seconds
 
So all looks about right.
 
CWatters said:
I assume it was thrown from the top of the building..

For 1) I used

S = ut + 0.5at^2

= 30*8 + 0.5(-9.8)82
= 240 - 313.6
= -73.6m

If you assume g = 10m/s/s then you get

= 240 - 320
= - 80m

-ve because it lands that distance below the height at which it was thrown from.

Why did you use t=8?, because wouldn't that include the height that it was thrown up at?, they wanted the height of the building
 
TheRedDevil18 said:
Why did you use t=8?, because wouldn't that include the height that it was thrown up at?, they wanted the height of the building
The equation used tells you the height relative to the starting point after t seconds. It doesn't matter what route it takes to get there. E.g. note that t=0 and t=60/9.8 both give s=0.
 
haruspex said:
The equation used tells you the height relative to the starting point after t seconds. It doesn't matter what route it takes to get there. E.g. note that t=0 and t=60/9.8 both give s=0.

It took 3 seconds to reach max height after it was thrown and another 3 seconds to come down to its starting point(edge of building) so wouldn't you have to use 8-6= 2's for the time?, sorry just a little confused
 
TheRedDevil18 said:
It took 3 seconds to reach max height after it was thrown and another 3 seconds to come down to its starting point(edge of building) so wouldn't you have to use 8-6= 2's for the time?, sorry just a little confused
Yes, but it's moving the opposite direction then. You seem to want to break it into stages, but there's no need. You can treat it as one smooth movement - in 8 seconds it will rise, then fall, and reach a point 73.6m below the start point. The quadratic equation encapsulates all of that.
 
  • #10
haruspex said:
Yes, but it's moving the opposite direction then. You seem to want to break it into stages, but there's no need. You can treat it as one smooth movement - in 8 seconds it will rise, then fall, and reach a point 73.6m below the start point. The quadratic equation encapsulates all of that.

Think that cleared things up, thanks
 
  • #11
Why did you use t=8?, because wouldn't that include the height that it was thrown up at?, they wanted the height of the building

Looks like you already got it but..

t=0 is "a" time that it is it is at the top of the building
t=8 is the time it is at the bottom of the building (eg the ground)

so the displacement S is the height of the building.

As haruspex said. The equation works for any point on the path even when that's below the starting point.

On a separate but related issue.. It's worth remembering that some problems have two possible solutions. For example a ball thrown up from the ground at an angle so that it lands on the roof of a building would have two solutions for the time of flight to height h. One on the way up and the other on the way down.
 

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K