Very important, Lagrange multiplier

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the maximum and minimum values of the function f = x^(1/4) + y^(1/3) subject to the constraint g = 4*x + 6*y = 720, utilizing the method of Lagrange multipliers.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the setup of the Lagrange multiplier method, including the formulation of the Lagrangian function. Some express confusion about taking partial derivatives and the implications of the Lagrange multiplier.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided guidance on how to approach the problem, including suggestions to eliminate the Lagrange multiplier by manipulating the equations. There are indications of varying levels of understanding among participants, with some expressing significant confusion about the mathematical processes involved.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the requirement to show prior work before receiving assistance, and there are mentions of specific challenges related to the complexity of the equations derived from the partial derivatives.

odporko
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Guys, i would be really greatfull if someone help me with this because i really don't know how to deal with this math problem: Find the maximum and minimum values of f = x^(1/4) + y^(1/3) on the boundary of g = 4*x+ 6*y = 720.
Please help me someone, i am desperate from this :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
odporko said:
Guys, i would be really greatfull if someone help me with this because i really don't know how to deal with this math problem: Find the maximum and minimum values of f = x^(1/4) + y^(1/3) on the boundary of g = 4*x+ 6*y = 720.
Please help me someone, i am desperate from this :(

You need to first show what you have done before we are allowed to offer help.

RGV
 
L ( x , y ) = x^(1/4) + y^(1/3) + λ ( 4*x + 6*y − 720 )

I am not able to partialy derivate this equation, it always has weird numbers and after that i am not able to continue because i don't understand L. multiplier very well.
 
odporko said:
L ( x , y ) = x^(1/4) + y^(1/3) + λ ( 4*x + 6*y − 720 )

I am not able to partialy derivate this equation, it always has weird numbers and after that i am not able to continue because i don't understand L. multiplier very well.

Are you saying you do not know how to differentiate x^(1/4) and x with respect x? If that is really true you need to go back and review introductory calculus.

RGV
 
1. Homework Statement

f(x,y) = x^(1/4)*y^(1/3), g(x,y) = 4*x +6*y=720
sorry i had a mistake before

2. Homework Equations

∇f=λ∇g
y^(1/3)/(4*x^(3/4))= 4*λ
x^(1/4)/(3*y^(2/3))= 6*λ

these are partial derivations, and we want to express y just with lambda and here is something that really terrifies me: 4096*((104976*y^(8/3)*λ)^(9/4))*λ, am i thinking right? or am i going wrong?
 
it goes for y=(1/ 812 479 653 374 328*λ^(13/4))^(1/5)... and now my mind already blew up
 
4*(1/450868486864896*λ^(11/3))^(1/5)+ 6*(1/ 812479653374328*λ^(13/4))^(1/5)-720=0
well this is the equation after i get x and y and now i am pretty sure i did something wrong...
 
odporko said:
1. Homework Statement

f(x,y) = x^(1/4)*y^(1/3), g(x,y) = 4*x +6*y=720
sorry i had a mistake before

2. Homework Equations

∇f=λ∇g
y^(1/3)/(4*x^(3/4))= 4*λ
x^(1/4)/(3*y^(2/3))= 6*λ
Good. So eliminate [itex]\lambda[/itex] by dividing the first equation by the second:
[tex]\frac{y^{1/3}}{4x^{3/4}}\frac{3y^{2/3}}{x^{1/4}}=\frac{3}{4}\frac{y}{x}= \frac{2}{3}[/tex]
so we must have y= (8/9)x. Put that into the equation of the constraint, 4x+6y= 720, to solve for x.

these are partial derivations, and we want to express y just with lambda and here is something that really terrifies me: 4096*((104976*y^(8/3)*λ)^(9/4))*λ, am i thinking right? or am i going wrong?
Well, what we want to do is to solve three equations in x, y, and [itex]\lambda[/itex] for x and y. We do not necessarily "want to express y just with lambda". There are many ways of solving for x and y. Since finding a value for [itex]\lambda[/itex] is not part of the solution, I suggest eliminating [itex]\lambda[/itex] first by dividing one equation by another.
 
odporko said:
1. Homework Statement

f(x,y) = x^(1/4)*y^(1/3), g(x,y) = 4*x +6*y=720
sorry i had a mistake before

2. Homework Equations

∇f=λ∇g
y^(1/3)/(4*x^(3/4))= 4*λ
x^(1/4)/(3*y^(2/3))= 6*λ

these are partial derivations, and we want to express y just with lambda and here is something that really terrifies me: 4096*((104976*y^(8/3)*λ)^(9/4))*λ, am i thinking right? or am i going wrong?

You can use the first equation to solve for y in terms of (x,λ), then substitute that y into the second equation to get an equation containing only x and λ. Solve for x in terms of λ, then substitute that x into the expression for y. You will end up with x and y expressed only in terms of λ, and the expressions are not too horrible:
[tex]x = \frac{2^{4/5}\, 3^{2/5}}{2304\, \lambda^{12/5}}, \;<br /> y = \frac{2^{4/5}\, 3^{2/5}}{2592\, \lambda^{12/5}}.[/tex]
Substituting these into the equation for g you get a simple linear equation in the variable
[itex]\lambda^{12/5},[/itex] so you can solve it and pick the relevant real, positive root. This turns out to be
[tex]\lambda = \frac{5^{7/12}\, 3^{1/12}\, 7^{5/12}\, 2^{1/6}}{720} \doteq 0.009827792083.[/tex] Now you can find x and y:
[tex]x = 540/7, \; y = 480/7, \; f(x,y) = \frac{540^{1/4}\, 7^{5/12} \,480^{1/3}}{7}<br /> \doteq 12.13030337.[/tex] This is the constrained max.

The constrained min cannot be found by Lagrange multipliers. Just recognize that f(x,y) is not defined for x < 0 and y < 0, so we are restricted to the region {x ≥ 0, y ≥ 0}, and that f = 0 when x = 0 or y = 0. Thus, there are two constrained min points, at (x,y) = (0,720/6) and (x,y) = (720/4,0), both giving f = 0.

RGV
 
  • #10
Thank you very much, you really really helped me probably pass the most important subject this semester :)
 
  • #11
An entire subject just on Lagrange Multipliers? Lol.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K