Vibrating String under Gravity: Solutions & Considerations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gear300
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity String
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the equation of motion for a vibrating string under gravity, incorporating transverse damping and driving forces. The derived equation indicates a parabolic solution for the string's shape, which contrasts with the expected hyperbolic cosine form for a hanging cable. It is clarified that the shape of the solution depends on the loading conditions; uniform horizontal loading results in a parabolic shape, while loading from the cable's weight leads to a catenary shape. The participants acknowledge the importance of correctly accounting for forces to derive the appropriate solution. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the nuances in modeling string behavior under different loading scenarios.
Gear300
Messages
1,209
Reaction score
9
Consider a string vibrating (with small amplitude) against a transverse damping force b(∂ψ/∂t) that acts per unit length. Also consider the effect of a transverse driving Fy that acts per unit length.

The equation of motion I got was
τ02xψ - b∂txψ + ∂xF(x,t) = λ02tψ ,
where τ0 is the tension along the string and λ0 is the linear mass density.

Now consider a string of length L in equilibrium under gravity.

The equation of motion thus becomes
τ02xψ - mg = 0 .
The solution I get from this is parabolic, whereas from what I remember, the form for a hanging chain/cable/wire/etc... is a hyperbolic cosine (cosh). I was wondering whether I made a mistake somewhere, or that this is a result of the small amplitude condition.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gear300 said:
The solution I get from this is parabolic, whereas from what I remember, the form for a hanging chain/cable/wire/etc... is a hyperbolic cosine (cosh). I was wondering whether I made a mistake somewhere, or that this is a result of the small amplitude condition.

If you assume the loading on the cable is uniform in the horizontal direction, the solution is a parabola.

If you assume the loading comes from the weight of the cable, the loading per horizontal distance is NOT uniform, because it depends on the slope of the cable at each point. For that case, the solution is a catenary.

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Catenary.html
 
AlephZero said:
If you assume the loading on the cable is uniform in the horizontal direction, the solution is a parabola.

If you assume the loading comes from the weight of the cable, the loading per horizontal distance is NOT uniform, because it depends on the slope of the cable at each point. For that case, the solution is a catenary.

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Catenary.html

Thanks. I just realized that might have been the case. My force was not done correctly.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top