Vibration Energy Harvester from Brownian motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a device from the University of Arkansas that uses a free-floating graphene sheet to harvest energy from Brownian motion and convert it into electric current. Concerns are raised about whether this process violates the second law of thermodynamics. It is clarified that extracting useful energy from these vibrations requires a thermal gradient or mechanical motion within the overall system. The original article appears to exaggerate the implications of the technology compared to the research paper, which focuses more on the scientific findings. Further examination of the research paper is suggested for a deeper understanding of the energy harvesting process.
Johan
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all, been a while since I studied physics but I saw something that I found strange,

This device: https://researchfrontiers.uark.edu/good-vibrations/ from University of Arkansas

A free floating graphene sheet extracting energy from brownian motion and converting that to electric current.

wouldn't this violate the second law of thermodynamics? or am I missing something?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The article is not really clear, so I had a look at the paper (pdf). As far as I understand that, you need a thermal gradient or mechanical motion of the overall system to drive these vibrations if you want to extract useful energy from them. The article makes a much bigger deal of this harvesting than the publication, which focuses on the research.
 
  • Like
Likes Dale
That recent report references this review, which may be of additional interest.
 
  • Like
Likes Johan
mtb, I'll have a look at the paper to see if I can get a better understanding of what is going on.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top