Virtual particle propagators in QFT

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the form of the propagator for virtual particles in quantum field theory, specifically referencing Halzen and Martin's "Quarks and Leptons." The general expression for the propagator is presented, and the Dirac propagator is confirmed as a specific case. A method to prove the general form involves using the Klein-Gordon operator and its eigenstates to derive the Green's function or propagator. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding eigenstates and eigenvalues in this context. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the theoretical framework underlying virtual particle propagators in quantum field theory.
Matthaeus
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am reading a nice book (Quarks and Leptons, by Halzen and Martin) about particle physics. It states that the general form of the propagator of a virtual particle is:
<br /> \dfrac{i\sum_{\text{spins}}}{p^2 - m^2}<br />

I see that this is the case for the Dirac propagator:

<br /> \dfrac{i(\displaystyle{\not}{p} + m)}{p^2 - m^2} = \dfrac{i\sum_{s}u_s(p)\bar{u}_s(p)}{p^2 - m^2}<br />

but how can I prove that always holds?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Matthaeus , I agree, Halzen and Martin is a very well written book, and highly useful. Although it does tend to be a bit informal, and you are not going to catch them "proving" anything. So in the same spirit, here is not a proof but an argument.

Let's say you have an operator L, which is generally a differential operator, and in particular will be the Klein-Gordon operator. You want to find the field |φ> at one point produced by a source |S> at another. The equation is L|φ> = |S>. The solution can be written formally as |φ> = L-1|S>. Expand L in terms of its eigenstates, namely L = ∑|n>Ln<n| where |n> are the eigenstates and Ln the eigenvalues. Then L-1 = ∑|n>Ln-1<n|. Thus |φ> = G|S> where G is the Green's function or propagator, G = ∑|n>Ln-1<n|.

For the Klein-Gordon operator the eigenstates are the plane wave solutions, Ln = k2 + m2, and the numerator ∑|n><n| is the sum over spins. Halzen and Martin go on to write this out in more detail for the only cases that are physically realistic: spin 0, 1/2 and 1.
 
Yes, I was also thinking about something along these lines.
Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K