Visualising the Hamiltonian constraint in inhomogeneous LQC

julian
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
857
Reaction score
361
In this paper called "Stepping out of Homogeneity in Loop quantum Cosmology" - http://arxiv.org/pdf/0805.4585.pdf. On page 4 they say "where the sum is over the couples of distinct faces at each tetrahedron, U_{ff'} = U_f U_{f_1} U_{f_2} \dots U^{-1}_{f'} where l_{ff'} = \{ f , f_1; f_2; \dots f^{\prime -1} \} is the link of the oriented faces around the edge where f and f' join,".

Could someone clarify this for me? Possibly with diagrams?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose you have a triangulated 3d-manifold and you want the curvature on this manifold. The triangulation is made by several tetrahedra: pick one of them, consider it on its own, and consider one of its bone (an edge). The curvature is obtained by performing the parallel transport (a Wilson loop) of the Ashtekar connection around the edge. So, if you start from the center of a tetrahedron, first you go from there to a face, you puncture it, and you come back to the starting point from another face by puncturing it. If you have a complicated triangulation, there would be some other tetrahedra attached to the same edge, sharing each one a face with the adjacent one: in this case, in order to come back, you would puncture more faces.
All the information about the curvature is stored in the faces. In principle, you can go from the center of the tetrahedron to the face, grasp the information about the curvature, and come back without puncturing the face: here we don't want to do this, so we take couple of distinct faces.
To get the full Hamiltonian constraint, you have to repeat this for each edge and sum everything.

I hope this could answer to your question. This construction follows the very first Hamiltonian constraint proposed by Rovelli/Smolin in the good old days.
If you need more details, maybe you can try this paper
http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.3020
that explain the same model with an up-to-date prospective and some developments.
Cheers,
Frances
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top