I Volatility of investment (/w currency hedging)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the overall volatility of an investment that includes currency hedging. It highlights that to find the total volatility, one should use the formula σ = √((16^2) + (5^2)), as the volatilities of the S&P 500 index and the currency are considered independent. The conversation clarifies that while multiplying deviations can be useful for actual returns, the volatility calculation relies on adding variances due to their independent nature. It also notes that neglecting certain terms in the multiplication becomes problematic when deviations are large. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurate investment volatility assessment.
egikm
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I´ve been trying to compute a volatility of invesment with currency hedging and I have a question. Let's take this example. We have our money in a fond copying the S&P500 index, which has 16% volatility, we also know that the current volatility of a dollar toward our currency is 5%. We want to know the volatility of the whole invesment.

Can I compute as following? If so, what is the reason for adding the two deviations instead of mulitplying them considering the volalitity of an index and a currency are mutualy independent.

$$\sigma=\sqrt{(16^2)+(5^2)}$$

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How would multiplying them make sense? If one gets fixed, do you lose all volatility?

What you can multiply are the actual courses, e.g. for deviations like (1+0.16)*(1+0.05) = 1+0.16+0.05+0.16*0.05. Neglect the last term, and you see that the deviations add.
If the deviations become large, neglecting the last term does not work any more.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top