Fine. You got there on your own.
Obviously I can't comment on your calculations without seeing them.
Starting with L=0.32 H, I get VL(0.039)=9.995 V rather than 9.8V
With L=0.33H, I get VL(0.039)= 10.05 V
My method ignores R1, as none of the current through R1 passes through L and vice versa.
So I look at the series combination of L and R2 with a constant 12V applied across it from the battery.
First I note that at t=0 no current is flowing through L and R2 and the full battery voltage appears across L.
After a long time when the current through L is near enough constant, no voltage appears across L and the full 12V is across R2, giving us the maximum current in L and in R2 as 12V / 1.5 Ω = 8 A
So the voltage across L starts at 12V then falls exponentially to zero and the current through L starts at 0 rising exponentially to 8A.
The time constant for this is given as τ = L/R so for L and R2 in series, 0.32 H in series with 1.5Ω, τ=0.32/1.5 = 0.2133 seconds
Therefore the voltage across the inductor, which starts at 12V at t=0, is given by VL(t)= VL(0) exp(-t/τ) or 12exp (-t/0.2133)
So VL(0.039) = 12exp (-0.039/0.2133) = 12 exp(-0.1828125) = 12 x 0.83292 = 9.99509 V or 10 V to 2SF.
So the voltage across R2 (not asked for) is 12 - 9,99509 = 2.00491 V or 2V to 2SF (since whichever Kirchoff law may apply, the battery maintains 12V across the LR series combination.)
And then the current in both L and R2 being equal, it must be 2V/1.5Ω = 1.3A (calculator readout is 1.3366066)
I can't see any of these values in your working, so i can't comment on any discrepancies.
For part b when the switch is opened, any current from the battery ceases and all current now flows in the series circuit of R1, L, R2.
There will obviously be a different time constant for the series circuit now, but the voltage and current will again vary exponentially with time.