Voltage of a point around an infinite long charged wire.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The voltage at a point around an infinitely long charged wire can be determined using the formula v = κλ ln(√(x² + y²) + x), where κ = 1/4Ωε and λ represents the charge per length. The integral for voltage contribution from the wire diverges when calculated from -∞ to +∞, indicating that the influence of charge at infinity does not affect the voltage at point p. This conclusion aligns with principles discussed in Khan Academy's resources on electric fields and potentials.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics and electric fields
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration techniques
  • Knowledge of potential difference and voltage concepts
  • Basic principles of charge distribution along a wire
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric potential from continuous charge distributions
  • Learn about the concept of divergence in integrals and its implications in physics
  • Explore Khan Academy's examples on electric fields and potentials for practical applications
  • Investigate the behavior of electric fields around different geometries, such as spherical and cylindrical charge distributions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, electrical engineering, and anyone interested in understanding electrostatic potentials and their calculations around charged objects.

null void
Messages
102
Reaction score
1
Lets say i have a infinitely long wire with charge per length, λ and a point, p of a position with its closest distance to the wire is y. The wire extend infinitely parallel to X-Axis. How to determine the voltage at the position p?

Can i first regard the voltage contributed by a very small charge in this expression:

dV = κ(λ dx)/√(x2 + y2) ...where κ = 1/4Ωε

v = κ(λ) ∫ dx/√(x2 + y2)
= κλ ln( √(x2 + y2 + x)

If the integral start from -∞ to +∞ of x, the formula does not converge, but my logic tells me that the charge of the wire at infinity doesn't affect the voltage at point p. Does this mean my approach is wrong?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
10K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
92
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
414
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
933
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K