Volume & Area: Can a Man Lift 10x His Weight?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter net_nubie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Areas Volumes
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of whether a man who increases his dimensions tenfold while maintaining constant density would find it easier to lift a weight equal to his new weight. The scope includes theoretical considerations of physics, biomechanics, and the implications of scaling in strength and weight.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that if a man's dimensions are increased tenfold, he would weigh 1000 times more, but they question whether he would be able to lift this new weight.
  • Others argue that strength is proportional to the cross-sectional area of muscles, suggesting that while the man would be heavier, he would not be proportionally stronger, potentially only 100 times stronger.
  • A participant mentions that the ambiguity in the phrase "lifting his own weight" could refer to either the original or the new weight after enlargement.
  • Some participants challenge the notion that being heavier necessarily equates to being stronger, citing examples like Sumo wrestlers who, despite their weight, have significant muscle mass due to training.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of momentum and how mass affects force exertion, with some suggesting that increased body mass does not directly translate to increased lifting capability.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the relationship between weight, strength, and the ability to lift. There is no consensus on whether it would be easier for the enlarged man to lift his new weight, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions, such as the definition of strength, the effects of body mass on lifting capability, and the ambiguity in the phrasing of the question. These factors contribute to the complexity of the discussion without reaching a definitive conclusion.

net_nubie
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
People, suppose a man can lift a weight equal to his own weight 2 mtrs. off the ground with very little effort. If his dimensions (i.e. LENGTH, BREDTH, HEIGHT) are increased 10 times, keeping his average density constant, will it be easier for him to lift his new weight 2 mtrs. off the ground? Why?
P.S. The hint is in the title of the question.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Could the man still stand, let alone lift the weight? I doubt it.
 
net_nubie said:
People, suppose a man can lift a weight equal to his own weight 2 mtrs. off the ground with very little effort. If his dimensions (i.e. LENGTH, BREDTH, HEIGHT) are increased 10 times, keeping his average density constant, will it be easier for him to lift his new weight 2 mtrs. off the ground? Why?
P.S. The hint is in the title of the question.

Weight equals on Earth 9.8 times the mass...so i'll use the word mass instead of weight since they are one and the same for man and box.

density = mass/volume.

density stays, volume increases. mass must increase as well. however, you used his instead of its twice. this means, the man will be 1000 times heavier becasue he is 1000 times more voluminous. SO...it would be like an elefant picking up an ant vs the orriginal where a turtle picked up an ant. YES, it will be much much much easier.
 
Robokapp said:
Weight equals on Earth 9.8 times the mass...so i'll use the word mass instead of weight since they are one and the same for man and box.
density = mass/volume.
density stays, volume increases. mass must increase as well. however, you used his instead of its twice. this means, the man will be 1000 times heavier becasue he is 1000 times more voluminous. SO...it would be like an elefant picking up an ant vs the orriginal where a turtle picked up an ant. YES, it will be much much much easier.
And exactly why would you think being heavier makes it easier to do things? Is it your experience that heavier people are necessarily stronger? That certainly isn't my experience.

"strength" depends on the cross-section area of the muscles. If a man were suddenly 10 times as large in each dimension, he would be 1000 times more "voluminous" and so weigh 1000 times as much. He would, however, be only 100 times as strong. As CRGreathouse said, it's unlikely that he would be able to stand!

You do have a good point that it is ambiguous whether lifting his "own weight" refers to the weight before or after enlarging. But even if it were he were trying to lift the same weight as he was lifting before enlarging, the problem would be to lift his own hands!
 
HallsofIvy said:
And exactly why would you think being heavier makes it easier to do things? Is it your experience that heavier people are necessarily stronger? That certainly isn't my experience.
"strength" depends on the cross-section area of the muscles. If a man were suddenly 10 times as large in each dimension, he would be 1000 times more "voluminous" and so weigh 1000 times as much. He would, however, be only 100 times as strong. As CRGreathouse said, it's unlikely that he would be able to stand!
You do have a good point that it is ambiguous whether lifting his "own weight" refers to the weight before or after enlarging. But even if it were he were trying to lift the same weight as he was lifting before enlarging, the problem would be to lift his own hands!

well, japonese Sumo wrestlers are very very fat and also very very strong. Imagine a normal 150 pounds human colliding with a Sumo wrestler...you'd have to scrape him off floor. It takes bigger effort to move a bigger body, so a fat person is in fact stronger. It has less strength for display because he wastes it all on movement, it it is stronger...unless he gets 1000 times the weight instantly which would be unconceivable...

but why do i have the feeling I'm making this harder than it is?
 
well, japonese Sumo wrestlers are very very fat and also very very strong. Imagine a normal 150 pounds human colliding with a Sumo wrestler...you'd have to scrape him off floor. It takes bigger effort to move a bigger body, so a fat person is in fact stronger. It has less strength for display because he wastes it all on movement, it it is stronger...unless he gets 1000 times the weight instantly which would be unconceivable...

How, exactly would getting 1000 times the weight be conceivable?
No, a "fat" person is not stronger! Certainly not just by virtue of being fat. Sumo wrestlers not only put on weight by eating an enormous amount, they also spend a lot of time exercising so that much of the weight put on IS muscle.
Now, why don't you go back and read the mathematics in my answer?
 
Robokapp said:
well, japonese Sumo wrestlers are very very fat and also very very strong. Imagine a normal 150 pounds human colliding with a Sumo wrestler...you'd have to scrape him off floor. It takes bigger effort to move a bigger body, so a fat person is in fact stronger. It has less strength for display because he wastes it all on movement, it it is stronger...unless he gets 1000 times the weight instantly which would be unconceivable...
but why do i have the feeling I'm making this harder than it is?
What you're thinking of is momentum. A Sumo wrestler has so much mass (easily 4 times an average person) running at half the speed they would exert twice the force, and the other person would get knocked back. However, this does not mean they can pick up large things. Many of them can, but that is because they exercise as well. If they were all fat and no muscle, they wouldn't be able to exert the torque on their arms necessary to lift something heavy. The strength your bicep muscle exerts on your lower arm has nothing to do with how heavy the rest of your body is. Increasing the size of your arm just means your muscle has to do more work, since it is pulling on a heavier object. The muscle would need to increase at the same rate.
 
Hallsofivy got it right. When I said "lift his own weight" I meant lifting his new weight after the change in size.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
18K