Volume Calculation: Disk, Washer & Shell Methods

  • Thread starter Thread starter jacy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Volume
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the methods for calculating the volume of solids of revolution, specifically focusing on the disk, washer, and shell methods. Participants express uncertainty about when to apply each method and seek clarification on guidelines for their use.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants share their knowledge of the methods and question the criteria for selecting one over the others. Some mention the importance of symmetry and the nature of the rotation, while others reference Pappus' Second Theorem as a potential consideration.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the topic, with participants offering insights and resources. Some have suggested external websites for further learning, while others express a desire for deeper understanding and clarification of the methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that their textbooks do not provide clear explanations, leading to confusion about the application of the methods. There is also mention of varying levels of familiarity with certain theorems, indicating differing backgrounds in the subject matter.

jacy
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
Hi,
Is there a guideline that one can follow when finding the volume of a solid obtained by revolving over a region. The three methods that i know are disk, washer, and shell method. But i don't know when to apply which method. My book doesn't explain it clearly. If anyone could help me with this, i will appreciate it. Thanking you, and have a safe and wonderful holiday.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jacy said:
Hi,
Is there a guideline that one can follow when finding the volume of a solid obtained by revolving over a region. The three methods that i know are disk, washer, and shell method. But i don't know when to apply which method. My book doesn't explain it clearly. If anyone could help me with this, i will appreciate it. Thanking you, and have a safe and wonderful holiday.


Depends on the symmetry of the object and how it is rotated, but you can apply both if you want. Actually, this is a good exercise...

Check out :

http://mathdemos.gcsu.edu/shellmethod/ I used this website when i tutored students in college. I recommend it...
disk and shell method

regards
marlon
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You could use Pappus' Second Theorem.
 
marlon said:
Depends on the symmetry of the object and how it is rotated, but you can apply both if you want. Actually, this is a good exercise...
Check out :
http://mathdemos.gcsu.edu/shellmethod/ I used this website when i tutored students in college. I recommend it...
disk and shell method
regards
marlon

thanks marlon, i will check it out.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Tide said:
You could use Pappus' Second Theorem.

I am not familiar with Pappus' Second theorem. We never learned that theorem. Thanks
 
jacy said:
Hi,
Is there a guideline that one can follow when finding the volume of a solid obtained by revolving over a region. The three methods that i know are disk, washer, and shell method. But i don't know when to apply which method. My book doesn't explain it clearly. If anyone could help me with this, i will appreciate it. Thanking you, and have a safe and wonderful holiday.
You use the disk method when you know you can distinquish a inner and outer fuction, and want to produce a glass china.
To use the waster method, you are trying to find many A(x), to do a intergral of many A(x)dx s. you see, A(x) can have different geometries( If you were to do a disk erercise with and waster method, then A(x) is always a damn circle)
The shell method is sort of like the waster method, but all you are doing is rotating a figure across a given axis.
My recommendation is to read that section 5 times, and try to understand it intuitively. My advice cannot do a damn thing for you, but it helps me to reflect more deeply.
 
Last edited:
jacy said:
I am not familiar with Pappus' Second theorem. We never learned that theorem. Thanks

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PappussCentroidTheorem.html"
The theorem is very interesting, is it not?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
siddharth said:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PappussCentroidTheorem.html"
The theorem is very interesting, is it not?


Thanks Siddharth, Tide, Marlon, and Kant. All u guys have a Happy New Year.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K