Volume of a Cube: Integrating s3 vs. s^3/3

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DocZaius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cube Volume
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the integration of the volume of a cube, specifically addressing the misconception that integrating the area of a slice of a cube using the formula \(\int^{s}_{0}s^{2} ds\) yields the correct volume. The correct approach involves recognizing that \(s\) is a constant during the integration process, leading to the integral \(\int_{0}^{s} s^2 \; dx\), which correctly evaluates to \(s^3\). The confusion arises from treating \(s\) as a variable rather than a constant in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of definite integrals
  • Familiarity with the concept of volume integration
  • Knowledge of calculus, specifically integration techniques
  • Basic understanding of geometric shapes and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of definite integrals in calculus
  • Learn about volume integration techniques for various geometric shapes
  • Explore the differences between integrating with constant versus variable limits
  • Practice problems involving the integration of volumes of solids
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, educators teaching integration techniques, and anyone interested in understanding geometric volume calculations through integration.

DocZaius
Messages
365
Reaction score
11
Note this is not a homework assignment. I was generally learning about integrating volumes and thought that after being able to integrate the volume of a cylinder

\int^{L}_{0}\pi r^{2} dL

That I maybe could integrate the volume of a cube in a simple way:

\int^{s}_{0}s^{2} ds

Yet that results in \frac{s^{3}}{3} and not the correct s^{3}

I don't understand why. I am taking the area of a slice of infinitesmall thickness (ds) and integrating it over the length of the cube. Seems to me to be the technique of integration for volumes. Where does my thinking go wrong?

Please note that I do realize the main difference between the integration of the volume of a cylinder and a cube is that the length of the cylinder is a separate variable from its radius. Despite being aware of this key difference, I still do not understand why the cube integration would not work even though the same variable is used.

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
DocZaius said:
That I maybe could integrate the volume of a cube in a simple way:

\int^{s}_{0}s^{2} ds

Yet that results in \frac{s^{3}}{3} and not the correct s^{3}

I don't understand why. I am taking the area of a slice of infinitesmall thickness (ds) and integrating it over the length of the cube. Seems to me to be the technique of integration for volumes. Where does my thinking go wrong?

Thanks!

The last inegral should be

\int_{0}^{s} s^2 \; dx

s is a constant, but the integral is being carried out along the interval [0, s].

--Elucidus
 
Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K