Volume of solid bounded by paraboloid and plane.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The volume of the solid bounded by the paraboloid defined by the equation 4z = x² + y² and the plane z = 4 can be calculated using double integrals or triple integrals. The integration limits for x and y are determined by the intersection of the paraboloid and the plane, which occurs at the circle x² + y² = 16. The recommended approach is to use polar coordinates, where r ranges from 0 to 4 and θ from 0 to 2π, integrating the function (4 - (1/4)(r²))r dθ dr to find the volume.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of triple integrals and double integrals
  • Familiarity with polar coordinates and their application in integration
  • Knowledge of the equations of paraboloids and planes
  • Ability to visualize 3D graphs and their projections onto 2D planes
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of polar coordinates in volume calculations
  • Learn how to set up and evaluate double integrals in cylindrical coordinates
  • Explore the method of using symmetry in integration to simplify calculations
  • Practice finding volumes of solids bounded by different surfaces using various integration techniques
USEFUL FOR

Students in calculus courses, particularly those studying multivariable calculus, as well as educators seeking to explain volume calculations involving paraboloids and planes.

philnow
Messages
83
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi. I'm asked to find the volume of the solid bounded by the paraboloid

4z=x^2 + y^2 and the plane z=4

I have drawn the graph in 3D but I'm unsure of how to set up the integral. Also, how does one decide to use double integrals/triple integrals when finding volume?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
philnow said:

Homework Statement



Hi. I'm asked to find the volume of the solid bounded by the paraboloid

4z=x^2 + y^2 and the plane z=4

I have drawn the graph in 3D but I'm unsure of how to set up the integral. Also, how does one decide to use double integrals/triple integrals when finding volume?
You could use both! But since V= \int\int\int dV= \int\int\int dzdydx but since the integral of "dz" is just z, if the boundaries can be written as z= f(x,y) and z= g(x,y), then that triple integral just reduces to the double integral \int\int\int (f(x,y)- g(x,y))dydx

Here the upper boundary is just z= 4 and the lower boundary is z= (1/4)(x^2+ y^2), You could integrate
\int\int\int_{z= (1/4)(x^2+y^2)}^4 dzdydx[/itex]<br /> or just write it as the double integral \int\int ((1/4)(x^2+y^2)- 4)dydx.<br /> <br /> Now, the limits of integration in x and y: When you graphed it you probably saw that the paraboloid and plane intersect where z= 4 and 4(4)= 16= x^2+ y^2 which, projected to the xy-plane is the circle x^2+ y^2= 16 and the entire figure is inside that cylinder. So the limits of integration for x and y are given by that circle. One way to cover that circle is to take x from -4 to 4 and, for each x, y from<br /> -\sqrt{16- x^2}<br /> to <br /> \sqrt{16- x^2}<br /> Or, because of symmetry, y from -4 to 4 and, for each y, x from <br /> -\sqrt{16- y^2}<br /> to <br /> \sqrt{16- y^2}.<br /> <br /> Perhaps simplest, because of the circular symmetry, is to use polar coordinates with r going from 0 to 4 and \theta from 0 to 2\pi. That would be the same as setting up the entire in cylindrical coordinates: the boundaries would have equations z= 4 and 4z= r^2 in cylindrical coordinates.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the reply. If I wanted to set it up using polar coordinates (I haven't covered cylindrical coordinates yet) I would take r between 0 and 4, theta between 0 and 2pi, but over what function would I integrate?
 
I can't seem to evaluate the integral using the "dydx" method, so I'm thinking this problem needs to be done using polar coordinates.
 
philnow said:
Thanks for the reply. If I wanted to set it up using polar coordinates (I haven't covered cylindrical coordinates yet) I would take r between 0 and 4, theta between 0 and 2pi, but over what function would I integrate?
I believe I answered that in the second paragraph of my response.
 
philnow said:
I can't seem to evaluate the integral using the "dydx" method, so I'm thinking this problem needs to be done using polar coordinates.
Sure you can.
\int_{x=-1}^1\int{y= -\sqrt{16-x^2}}^\sqrt{16-x^2} (4- (1/4)(x^2+ y^2)dydx[/itex]<br /> <br /> The first integral will give, of course, 4y- (1/4)(x^2y+ (1/3)y^3) evaluated between <br /> -\sqrt{16- x^2} and \sqrt{16-x^2} or 8\sqrt{1-x^2}+ 2(x^2\sqrt{1- x^2}+ (1/3)(1- x^2)^{3/2} and that looks like a candidate for a trig substitution like x= sin(t).<br /> <br /> But yes, it will be much simpler in polar coordinates.
 
Well, I'm not sure what part of your post corresponds to the second paragraph >.<

So does this integral look correct?

Double integral from 0 to 4 and from 0 to 2pi

(4-(x^2+y^2)/4)*r d(theta)dr = (4 - r/4)*r d(theta)dr
 
Could I get a confirmation that this is indeed correct?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K