Volume of the solid of revolution

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the volume of a solid defined by cross-sections that are squares, with the solid lying between the planes at x = 0 and x = 4. The cross-sections are determined by the parabolas y = -sqrt(x) and y = sqrt(x).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to find the volume by integrating the area of the square cross-sections, but questions arise regarding the calculation of the diagonal and the area. Participants discuss the relationship between the diagonal and the side length of the squares, with some questioning the application of the Pythagorean theorem.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the calculations and reasoning behind the volume determination. Some guidance has been offered regarding the correct interpretation of the diagonal's length, and there is an acknowledgment of a mistake in the original poster's approach. The conversation is ongoing, with participants clarifying concepts and addressing misunderstandings.

Contextual Notes

There is a note that the problem may not represent a solid of revolution, which could influence the interpretation of the calculations. Additionally, the original poster expresses confusion about the relationship between the diagonal and the area of the squares.

calchelp
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
i need someone to explain to me where i am making a mistake because i am getting an answer that differs from that of the book.


the solid lies between planes perpendicular to the x-axis at x = 0 and x = 4. the cross-sections perpendicular to the axis on the interval 0 ≤ x ≤ 4 are squares whose diagonals run from the parabola y = - sqrt x to the parabola y = sqrt x.


ok so...

the base of the square is a.
the diagonal is 2a2.
the diagonal is 2 sqrt x.
so a2, the area of the square, is sqrt x.
therefore,
{integral} from 0 to 4 of sqrt x
antidifferentiate and you get 2/3 x3/2
plug in 4 and 0

final answer: 16/3
book says: 16

where did i mess up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is 4^(3/2)? Find that then multiply it by 2. Divide by 3 (because you're multiplying 4^(3/2) by (2/3)) and you'll see what happened.

P.S.: This is not a solid of revolution. Just so you know.
 
4^(3/2)= 8
8*2=16
16/3= 16/3
i still did not get 16...
 
Oh, I'm sorry. I read that wrong and flipped the two in my mind. I'll need to think on it some more.
 
Okay, I have it now. Check the length you have for the diagonal of the square because it is incorrect.
 
diagonals run from the parabola y = - sqrt x to the parabola y = sqrt x.

the diagonal is the distance from y = - sqrt x to y = sqrt x
how is that not 2 sqrt x?
i honestly can't figure it out.
is there a formula to figure it out?
 
Yes, the diagonal in terms of x is 2 sqrt(x). However, the diagonal in terms of a you have right now is 2a^2. How did you arrive at this? I presume by the Pythagorean Theorem. However, that does not give you the length of the diagonal. It merely tells you that the sums of the squares of the sides gives you the square of the diagonal (a^2 + a^2 = 2a^2).

What would you need to do to 2a^2 then to get the length not square of the length of the diagonal in terms of a?
 
i can't believe i made that stupid of a mistake.
so a^2 = 2x
so the volume is 16
thank you so much.
 
You're welcome! Anytime!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K