Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the etiquette and implications of reaching out to REU (Research Experiences for Undergraduates) program directors regarding application statuses. Participants share their experiences, concerns about waiting for results, and questions about eligibility for future applications, particularly for mathematics REUs.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Debate/contested
- Homework-related
Main Points Raised
- One participant expresses concern about whether it is bad etiquette to contact REU directors for updates on their application status, noting the silence from the programs as potentially negative.
- Another participant suggests that silence may indicate that the selection process is ongoing, and encourages reaching out to inquire about application status while explaining personal circumstances.
- Several participants share their own experiences with REU applications, including rejections and waiting for responses from various programs.
- Questions arise regarding the eligibility of international students for REU programs, with some participants noting that most are funded by the NSF and typically restricted to U.S. citizens.
- One participant discusses their academic background and inquires about the competitiveness of their profile for future REU applications, while others provide comparative insights into their own experiences and coursework.
- Concerns are raised about the necessity of having formal credit for advanced courses to strengthen an application, with suggestions that having a professor's endorsement may help.
- A participant shares a communication from an REU program indicating delays in decision-making due to funding issues, reflecting the uncertainty in the application process.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not reach a consensus on the etiquette of contacting REU directors, with some supporting the idea while others remain uncertain. There is also no agreement on the eligibility of international students, as experiences and information vary.
Contextual Notes
Participants mention specific REU programs and their application statuses, highlighting the variability in responses and timelines. There are references to the competitive nature of REU admissions and the importance of academic preparation, but no definitive criteria are established.
Who May Find This Useful
Undergraduate students considering applying to REU programs, particularly those who are uncertain about application etiquette, eligibility, and the impact of their academic background on their chances of acceptance.