News Was Judge Weinstein's Dismissal of the Agent Orange Suit Justified?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kat
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Judge Weinstein dismissed the class action suit by Vietnamese victims of Agent Orange, concluding that the random poisoning resulting from the deforestation during the Vietnam War did not constitute a crime against humanity or violate any treaties. He emphasized that customary international law defines crimes against humanity within narrow categories, such as genocide or torture, none of which applied to the use of Agent Orange. The ruling highlighted that the chemical's use was a side-effect of military strategy rather than a targeted act against a specific group, complicating its classification under international law. While the decision was disappointing for the victims, it underscored the legal complexities and limitations surrounding the case, without undermining the profound suffering caused by Agent Orange.
kat
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Interesting ruling on the Class action Suite by vietnamese victims of Agent Orange

Why Judge Weinstein Dismissed VAVAO's Agent Orange ATCA Suit

So why, in the end, did Judge Weinstein dismiss the Agent Orange suit - having rejected all these possible arguments for dismissal?

The reason he gave was simple: The random poisoning of a large number of people, if it is a side-effect of the deforestation of a battleground, is neither a crime against humanity, nor a violation of any treaty to which the U.S. was a signatory at the time the poisoning occurred.

Customary international law, Judge Weinstein reasoned, requires crimes against humanity to fit into one of a number of relatively narrow categories: genocide, enslavement, deportation or forcible transfer of population, torture, or forced pregnancy. But poisoning with Agent Orange (at least as it was done by the U.S.), he concluded, fit none of these categories.


http://writ.news.findlaw.com/sebok/20050321.html
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Like it was yesterday

I've always felt that the coverup and denial by our government and the chemical companies was a war-crime it itself. A lot of birth defects and deaths should of been treated and studied but alas our government did yet another coverup.
I remember in 1970, about 6am (still dark) walking to pick up messages with a fellow soldier as a truck drove by spraying. My friend backed up to avoid the spray and said "you should back up because that stuff may be toxic or something". I chose not to back up because there could be mines planted in the ground and I figured the toxins sprayed would be slower to act and the lesser of two evils.
A decade later the VA hospital told me that nothing was sprayed in my area of Nam and that Agent Orange wasn't bad anyway. (I felt like finding some and throwing it on the doctor and seeing if she still felt that way).
By the way, I have a few photos of a fence line in that area on my website homepage at the bottom. It is probably slow to load but you can tell that not much grew there even though the area was a rainy area that normally had a lot of plant growth. Gil of http://www.surrealcity.com
 



The dismissal of the Agent Orange case is certainly an interesting ruling, and one that has sparked much debate and discussion. While it may seem like a disappointing outcome for the Vietnamese victims, there are valid reasons for Judge Weinstein's decision. As the article points out, the use of Agent Orange was not considered a crime against humanity or a violation of any treaty at the time it occurred. This is an important factor to consider in the context of the case.

Furthermore, Judge Weinstein's reasoning that the poisoning with Agent Orange did not fit into any of the categories of crimes against humanity is also worth considering. While it may have had devastating effects on the victims, the use of Agent Orange was not specifically intended to target a certain group of people based on their race, ethnicity, or religion - which is often a defining characteristic of crimes against humanity.

It is also important to note that the use of Agent Orange was a side-effect of deforestation, rather than a deliberate act of chemical warfare. This further complicates the issue and makes it difficult to classify it as a crime against humanity.

Overall, while the dismissal of the case may be disappointing for the Vietnamese victims, it is important to consider the legal complexities involved and the limitations of international law in this situation. It is also worth noting that this ruling does not diminish the suffering and impact that Agent Orange had on the victims and their families.
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top