Was the Universe Not Perfectly Homogeneous at Photon-Decoupling?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the universe was perfectly homogeneous or anisotropic at photon-decoupling, as illustrated by the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) fluctuations. Participants argue that these fluctuations, caused by varying dark matter densities, indicate a lack of homogeneity rather than perfect isotropy. It is noted that while the universe is statistically homogeneous and isotropic when averaged over small-scale fluctuations, the presence of these fluctuations suggests some degree of inhomogeneity. The relationship between inhomogeneity and anisotropy is explored, with the consensus leaning towards the idea that CMB anisotropy arises from matter inhomogeneity. Ultimately, the complexity of measuring these properties in space limits definitive conclusions.
Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi guys

Please take a look at this familiar picture: http://www.astr.ua.edu/keel/galaxies/wmap_map.jpg

Does this imply that the universe was not perfectly homogeneous or that it was anisotropic at the time of photon-decoupling?

Since the CMB-fluctuations are because of the different dark-matter densities, I would say that it is because of lack of homogenity. Am I corret?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Strictly speaking, it is neither homogeneous nor isotropic.
The Universe is (more or less) statistically homogeneous and statistically isotropic averaged over all small scale fluctuations of density, temperature, velocity and grav.potential.
Those fluctuations are actually small - only about 1 part in 100,000 (they are enhanced for the picture).
 
But if to be very correct, the fluctuation are because of different densities in matter, so it must be lack of homogeneity?
 
It's a matter or your personal preference.
Spatial dispersion is usually being related to inhomogeneity,
angular dispersion - to anisotropy. Thus people usually prefer to say that anisotropy of CMB is caused by inhomogeneity of matter. You can say, as well, that inhomogeneity of CMB is caused by anisotropy of matter. Unfortunately, we cannot experimentally prove the second case, since we cannot travel in space far enough to measure CMB inhomogeneity.
Mathematically:
Inhomogeneous=>anisotropic, isotropic in every point => homogeneous.
 
Excellent, thanks!
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...
Back
Top