Water activity meter reading over 1

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the readings obtained from a water activity meter, specifically when measurements exceed a value of 1. Participants explore whether this phenomenon is due to the meter's functionality or if it reflects an underlying physical principle, particularly in the context of measuring water activity in food sciences.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the water activity meter shows readings of 1.02 or 1.03 when the sample temperature is about 0.5° below the set temperature, raising questions about the meter's accuracy or underlying physical phenomena.
  • Another participant inquires if 'water activity' refers to the refractive index of water, indicating a potential misunderstanding of the term.
  • A clarification is provided that water activity measures the saturation of water vapor, relevant in food sciences, suggesting a connection to thermodynamic definitions.
  • Questions are raised about the specific device used for measurements and its accuracy, with speculation that the observed readings could be an accuracy issue or related to the device's software not filtering out anomalies.
  • A participant proposes that the readings above one may be attributed to hysteresis, linked to the frequency of temperature sampling and the condition of the mirror used in the device.
  • It is suggested that the device may display preliminary values for user convenience, despite the potential inaccuracies at non-stable temperatures.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the cause of the readings above one, with some attributing it to device limitations and others considering physical explanations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact reason for the observed measurements.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the device's functionality and the definitions of water activity. The discussion does not clarify the accuracy of the measurements or the specific conditions under which the readings were taken.

fedaykin
Messages
136
Reaction score
3
Good evening. I recently was taught how to use our new water activity meter, and I noticed something strange.
This meter uses changes in the reflectance of a mirror.

Whenever we'd bring the sample up to temperature, the measurement would reach a low point, then at about 0.5° below our set temperature of 25°, the measurement would hit about 1.02 or 1.03. I'm curious if this is a quirk of the meter itself, or if there is a physical phenomenon underlying this. The underlying sample was a tomato paste with aw measured at about 0.99.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
When you say 'water activity' are you referring to the refractive index of water?
 
Which device are you using to get those measurements?
How accurate is the measurement in general?
Could be a simple accuracy issue, but it is odd that the device software doesn't filter it.
 
Borek said:
Nope, water activity is a measure of the saturation of the water vapor, used in food sciences: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_activity

Not that I knew it, had to google.

Well, that's pretty much the definition of activity in thermodynamics.

Sounds like a dew point measurement.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Borek
Thank you for all the posts here.
I've decided the readings above one are probably from hysteresis, probably due to a difference in frequency of sampling temperature and mirror fogginess.
The makers of the device (it's an Aqualab 4) could assume that people would only use the result at a stable temperature.
Since the device has a target temperature, it simply waits for the measurement to stabilize to a certain accuracy within range.

Perhaps they display a preliminary value for convenience of the end user.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K