Water waves vs. other wave types

  • Thread starter Thread starter zacman2400
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Water Wave Waves
AI Thread Summary
Water waves increase in amplitude as they approach shore due to energy conservation, behaving similarly to waves in a denser medium. In contrast, sound waves and other wave types, like those on a string or seismic waves, typically experience a decrease in amplitude when moving into a denser medium. This is because intensity is linked to both the bulk modulus and density, while amplitude is related to the square of displacement. The presence of a dispersion term in water wave equations differentiates them from simpler wave forms, complicating direct analogies. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurately comparing wave behaviors across different mediums.
zacman2400
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I know that as water waves get closer to shore, amplitude increases via energy conservation, and from what I have read shallow water behaves analogously to an increasingly dense medium (or at least higher index of refraction). If I try and extend this analogy to sound wave/wave on string/earthquakes in a more dense medium, I find that the amplitude should decrease. Consider the sound wave first: Intensity is proportional to square root of the bulk modulus of the material and density, it is also proportional to the square of the displacement amplitude. Assume minimal reflection between the two media. If the density increases, the amplitude should decrease somewhat..however this reasoning does not feel correct. I just need some idea of how or where my reasoning is incorrect.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equations for gravity surface waves in water contain a dispersion term, not present in simpler wave forms such as the acoustic waves you mention.
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top