Wave function - displacement - transverse wave

Click For Summary
A transverse wave on a string is described with an amplitude of 1.20 m, a wavelength of 4.60 m, and a speed of 14.3 m/s. The displacement at x = 2.6 m and t = 8.60 s was initially calculated as 0.495 m but later corrected to -0.51 m using the wave equation y(x,t) = A cos(kx - ωt). The calculations for frequency, angular frequency, and wave number were confirmed as f = 3.11 Hz, ω = 19.54 rad/s, and k = 1.36. The discussion emphasizes the importance of precision in calculations and the use of symbolic representation before plugging in numerical values.
Jozefina Gramatikova
Messages
62
Reaction score
9

Homework Statement


A transverse traveling wave on a string starts at x = 0 and travels towards x = ∞. The wave has an amplitude of 1.20 m, wavelength of 4.60 m and travels at a speed of 14.3 m/s . At time t = 0.0 s the displacement at position x = 0.0 m is 1.20 m.
(b) Calculate the displacement at position x = 2.6 m when t = 8.60 s.

An identical wave is launched on a new string, whose mass per unit length doubles at some position x > 0.
(c) Determine wavefunctions for the reflected and transmitted waves. You do not need to consider their amplitudes.

Homework Equations


y(x,t)=Acos(kx-wt)

The Attempt at a Solution


I think since at x=0 and t=0 , the displacement is equal to 1.2m, then we need to use y(x,t)=Acos(kx-wt) not y(x,t)=Asin(kx-wt) please tell me if this is true.
I got an answer for the displacement y(x,t)=y(2.6,8.60)=0,495m, using this formula: y(x,t)=Acos(kx-wt) but I am not sure if this is true. Please tell me if I am wrong and what should I do to fix it.
I found out that f=3.11Hz w=19.54 rad/s k=1.36
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jozefin Gramatikova said:
y(x,t)=Acos(kx-wt) not y(x,t)=Asin(kx-wt) please tell me if this is true.
The general expression is ##y(x,t) = A \sin(kx - \omega t + \phi)##, where ##\phi## is a constant. You can fix this constant using your information. The equations you quote are special cases. Does your choice satisfy the special case?

Jozefin Gramatikova said:
I found out that f=3.11Hz w=19.54 rad/s k=1.36
How did you arrive at these conclusions? It helps us if you write out your argumentation and computations so that they can be checked. What relations did you use to arrive at these numbers?
 
Orodruin said:
The general expression is ##y(x,t) = A \sin(kx - \omega t + \phi)##, where ##\phi## is a constant. You can fix this constant using your information. The equations you quote are special cases. Does your choice satisfy the special case?How did you arrive at these conclusions? It helps us if you write out your argumentation and computations so that they can be checked. What relations did you use to arrive at these numbers?
f=v/lamda=14.3/4.6=3.11 Hz
w=2pif=2pi3.11=19.54 rad/s
k=2pi/lamda=2pi/4.6=1.36

this is given:
A=1.20 m
t= 8.60 s
x = 2.6

y(x,t)=Acos(kx-wt)
y(x,t)=1.2cos(1.36x2.6-19.64x8.6)
y(x,t)=1.2(-0.42)
y(x,t)=-0.51m

i think i was wrong with my previous result, but I am still unsure with the one that I got now
 
Jozefin Gramatikova said:
y(x,t)=1.2cos(1.36x2.6-19.64x8.6)
Need to be careful with the precision here. If you have an expression like cos(2πa) then the integer part of a is irrelevant. If you have calculated a to three significant figures as -26.3 then you really only have one significant figure, -.3.
Try avoiding plugging in numbers so soon. (That's a good approach for many reasons.). Use symbols for all the given data, t for time, v for speed etc. You should get an expression of the form cos(2π(..)). Make sure you then calculate the ... part to three decimal places.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K