Can a particle's wavefunction become perfectly flat in empty space over time?

  • Thread starter Thread starter asimov42
  • Start date Start date
asimov42
Messages
376
Reaction score
4
Hi everyone,

I have a rather naive question regarding wave-packet spreading. I understand that a particle's wavefunction will spread out in space over time (assuming no measurements are made) due to momentum uncertainty. Now my question:

If we have an isolated particle in otherwise empty space, and we measure, say, it's position, immediately after the measurement, the particle's wavefunction with start to spread out in space. Is it every possible for the particle's wavefunction to become perfectly `flat' (i.e. to have an exactly uniform distribution over all of space) in finite time? (considering the particle alone - if the rest of the universe were empty)

Assuming space is infinite, this would seem impossible to me - if we integrated the square of the wavefunction over any finite region of space, the probability of finding the particle there would be zero?

Thanks.

J.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. not in finite time, size ~ sqrt(h*t/m), where t=time.

Why is that impossible? Its the same as in classical physics. You have one particle (normalization in QM) in an infinite box, What is the probability you find it in a volume of 1dm^3? =0
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top