Is Wave-Particle Dualism the Key to Understanding Quantum Mechanics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ratzinger
  • Start date Start date
Ratzinger
Messages
291
Reaction score
0
In my naive understanding of quantum mechanics I always believed that the so-called wave-particle dualism corresponds to the two co-existing processes, unitary time evolution of state vectors and measurement. Wave-like behaviour refers to time evolution of the state, particle-like when measurements are taking.

I found my view confirmed when reading two popular books, Feynman’s “QED” and Nick Herberts “Quantum physics”. Both explicitly stress that whenever we measure and do it carefully enough we get clicks and dots, particle-like behaviour. Waves, superposition, smeared-out states belong to what happens between measurements.

But after reading here diverse threads on PF my view looks not so right anymore to me. Can someone say something to this?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the spirit of Copenhagen, you have it 100% correct!

When we talk back and forth here in the PF threads, we are sometimes somewhat idiomatic in how we say things. For example, someone might say something like:

"The particle goes through both slits."

In Copenhagean terms, this is understood to mean:

"The wavefunction propagates through both slits."
 
Or, you can think that the universe itself is in a superposition of states and the particle actually goes thru both slits. This leads to the multiverse / many-worlds interpretation of QM. See Wikipedias http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-worlds_interpretation" for example.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
kvantti said:
Or, you can think that the universe itself is in a superposition of states and the particle actually goes thru both slits. This leads to the multiverse / many-worlds interpretation of QM. See Wikipedias http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-worlds_interpretation" for example.

But is the universe coherent? Won't in instantly decohere from random self-interactions?:smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
selfAdjoint said:
But is the universe coherent? Won't in instantly decohere from random self-interactions?:smile:

The "real" question is: is the multiverse coherent? :wink:

As soon as the coherent state is lost, you observe one quantum state in one universe and the other states in other universes. But the observation does not create the other universes as usually thought; they exist already side by side in a superposition before observation. This is a crucial point that usually gets missed.

Even when I observe the state of a particle, there always exists a universe where it hasn't been observed yet.

Oops, I got a little offtopic here... anyway, I'm a proponent of the MWI. :rolleyes:
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top