Wavefunction for shifted harmonic oscillator potential

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31

Homework Statement



Consider the following potential, which is symmetric about the origin at ##x=0##:

##V(x) =
\begin{cases}
x^{2}+(x+\frac{d}{2}) &\text{for}\ x < -d/2\\
x^{2} &\text{for}\ -d/2 < x < d/2\\
x^{2}-(x-\frac{d}{2}) &\text{for}\ x > d/2
\end{cases}##

Find the ground state energy and wavefunction for this potential.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



For ##x < -d/2##, ##V(x) = (x+\frac{1}{2})^{2}+\frac{2d-1}{4} = (x+\frac{1}{2})^{2}##,and

for ##x > d/2##, ##V(x) = (x-\frac{1}{2})^{2}+\frac{2d-1}{4} = (x-\frac{1}{2})^{2}##.

So, the wavefunctions in these two sectors are the shifted-in-position harmonic oscillator wavefunctions.

So, for ##x < -d/2##, ##\psi_{n}(x) \sim \text{exp}\Big(-\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}(x-\frac{1}{2})^{2}\Big)\ H_{n}\Big(\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{\hbar}}(x-\frac{1}{2})\Big)##,

for ##-d/2 < x < d/2##, ##\psi_{n}(x) \sim \text{exp}\Big(-\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}x^{2}\Big)\ H_{n}\Big(\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{\hbar}}x\Big)##, and

for ##x > d/2##, ##\psi_{n}(x) \sim \text{exp}\Big(-\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}(x+\frac{1}{2})^{2}\Big)\ H_{n}\Big(\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{\hbar}}(x+\frac{1}{2})\Big)##.

But, the wavefunctions at the potential kinks at ##x=-d/2## and ##x=d/2## do not match.

Is there some sorcery of the kink in the potential - perhaps the discontinuity at ##V'(-d/2)## and at ##V(d/2)## - that causing this behaviour of the wavefunction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't looked into this problem much, but the thought that occurs to me is that you can't assume the solution for the middle region is the regular SHO solution. Those solutions were derived assuming the wave function had to be normalizable when integrating over all x. You no longer have that constraint.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: spaghetti3451