Wavelength/frequency & it's effect on optical properties

NSX
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, I'm not sure if this is in the correct topic, so please move to a correct one if need be.

Are there any mathematical relationships between the wavelength or frequency of an electromagnetic ray and the optical properties of a material?

By optical properties, I mean the scattering coefficient (\mu_s), absorption coefficient (\mu_a), and anisotropy factor (g).

i.e. f(\lambda or f) = stuff and \mu_s, etc.

Preferably, there would be only one equation, which governs all types of emr's and materials, but I don't know if there is such thing.

If not, literature pointing to similar things would be great too!

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Neither is there one equation for all types of materials nor usually, for all frequencies.

The response to an EM field is different in gases, solid dielectrics and metals (not to say anything about glasses, molecular solids, liquid crystals, plasmas, etc.) And even for a metal, the low frequency behavior is quite different from the high frequency limit. This is not to say that there isn't a single underlying property that is at the root of this. There is - it is the dielectric constant, \epsilon(\omega).

As to literature, here are a couple that come to mind :

Classical Electrodynamics, Jackson
Feynman's Lectures (-Vol. 2, I think), Feynman, Leighton, Sands
 
Last edited:
Gokul43201 said:
Neither is there one equation for all types of materials nor usually, for all frequencies.

The response to an EM field is different in gases, solid dielectrics and metals (not to say anything about glasses, molecular solids, liquid crystals, plasmas, etc.) And even for a metal, the low frequency behavior is quite different from the high frequency limit. This is not to say that there isn't a single underlying property that is at the root of this. There is - it is the dielectric constant, \epsilon(\omega).

As to literature, here are a couple that come to mind :

Classical Electrodynamics, Jackson
Feynman's Lectures (-Vol. 2, I think), Feynman, Leighton, Sands

ah, thanks Gokul43201!

I was getting the idea that there is no underlying equation, because the papers I've read dealt with different materials, and also had different equations to find out such coefficients.

I will check out the Feynman Lecture as you suggested.

:smile:
 
Some engineering texts on this will be helpful. Try this. It's graduate level but
gets down to brass tacks quickly.

http://www.elx.com.au/item/0471621943
 
Last edited by a moderator:
THis is a good book too - "Electrodynamics of solids" - Dressel & Gruner, Camb. Univ. Press
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Back
Top