Wavelength used in double slit experiment

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of wavelengths in the double slit experiment, specifically addressing the confusion between the bright and dark fringe equations. The correct wavelength for the third order bright fringe was determined to be 472 nm, as opposed to the initially suggested 495 nm. Participants highlighted the importance of accurately applying the formulas m × lambda for bright fringes and (m - 1/2) × lambda for dark fringes. The conversation concluded with a consensus on the correct wavelength and the need for precise calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the double slit experiment principles
  • Familiarity with wave interference patterns
  • Knowledge of fringe equations for bright and dark patterns
  • Basic skills in wavelength calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the double slit experiment equations
  • Learn about wave interference and its applications in optics
  • Explore the significance of fringe order in wavelength determination
  • Investigate common errors in wavelength calculations in physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding wave mechanics and optical experiments will benefit from this discussion.

songoku
Messages
2,509
Reaction score
393
Homework Statement
In two separate double slit experiments, two different wavelengths are used. First wavelength is 708 nm and it is observed the second order bright fringe occurs at same position as third order dark fringe of second wavelength. Determine the second wavelength
Relevant Equations
Bright fringe: d sin theta = m.lambda

Dark fringe: d sin theta = (m - 1/2).lambda
m × lambda for bright = (m - 1/2) × lambda for dark so:
2 × 708 = 2.5 × second lambda
Second lambda = 566.4 nm

But the answer is 495 nm. Where is my mistake? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like they did it for 3rd order bright fringe. Did you copy the problem correctly? Looks like they may have made an error.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
I agree with your answer. You could round it to 566 nm, however, the original wavelength was not given with more digits either.

708/495 = 1.43 and 495/708 = 0.70 both don't look like plausible fractions and I don't find an easy typo that would lead to this answer.

@Charles Link: That would be 472 nm.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku and Charles Link
@mfb has the 472 correctly computed. I should have multiplied it out, instead of estimating it. (495 is not correct for any choice).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
Thank you very much for the help Charles Link and mfb
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K