Ways to differentiate homework/textbook questions from regular questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter moonman239
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To differentiate homework and textbook questions from regular inquiries, users should include a phrase like "(not for homework/textbook)" in the thread title and check a box confirming their question's nature before posting. Simply stating that a question is not related to homework may not suffice; providing context about the motive behind the question can lead to more tailored responses. The homework forum is designated for homework-related questions, and non-homework inquiries that resemble these types may still receive similar treatment. Encouraging users to clarify their intentions can help others offer appropriate assistance. Overall, clear communication about the nature of the question enhances the quality of responses received.
moonman239
Messages
276
Reaction score
0
As stated, here are a couple ways to differentiate homework- and textbook-style questions:

1) Have users put a phrase like (not for homework/textbook) in the thread title.

2) Place a checkmark before the Submit Thread button thart says,"This thread is not a homework or textbook-related question.". Require that users check this mark before their thread is posted.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My opinion, not an official forum policy:

Just saying your question is not a homework or other textbook-style exercise may not be enough. I recommend saying why you are asking the question. Letting others in on your motive can help people give a more appropriate answer -- i.e. at the proper level, giving/withholding the right amount of help, or pointing you to a suitable reference.
 
Note that the HW forum is for homework and textbook-like questions. Generally, even if it is not meant for a homework assignment, if someone is asking those types of questions, they will get the same benefit of it being treated like a HW question as those who are actually doing it for HW.
 
Letting others in on your motive can help people give a more appropriate answer -- i.e. at the proper level, giving/withholding the right amount of help, or pointing you to a suitable reference.

Could I suggest this as a nearly perfect model for both questioner information and answer?

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=411865

Look how short and sweet it is.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...
Back
Top