Welcome to Junkyard Physics - Learn & Teach Here!

  • Thread starter Thread starter MrREC
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of "Junkyard Physics," which participants interpret as a way to explain physics in simpler terms for those without formal training in the subject. The scope includes the challenges of understanding physics without advanced degrees, the role of simplification in teaching, and the potential for non-experts to contribute to discussions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express a desire to learn and teach physics using "Junkyard Physics" as a method of simplifying complex ideas for those without formal training.
  • Others argue that a solid understanding of physics is necessary before attempting to explain it to others, emphasizing the importance of knowledge in both technical and simplified language.
  • A participant questions the meaning of "Junkyard Physics," suggesting it may refer to common sense, but warns that common sense can often be misleading.
  • Some participants acknowledge the existence of "junkyard physicists" who can contribute effectively as long as they recognize their limitations.
  • There is a suggestion that while enjoyment of physics does not require a higher degree, understanding it may necessitate more formal knowledge.
  • A participant expresses frustration with the perceived elitism in the forum, feeling that advanced knowledge is sometimes showcased rather than shared in an accessible manner.
  • Several participants discuss the need for intermediaries to help explain concepts to those with rudimentary knowledge, highlighting the diversity of backgrounds among forum members.
  • One participant attempts to relate a mathematical formula (e=mc^2) to practical applications, but this is met with skepticism and correction from others.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not reach consensus on the value or appropriateness of "Junkyard Physics." While some see merit in simplifying explanations, others emphasize the need for a solid understanding before teaching. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the balance between accessibility and accuracy in physics communication.

Contextual Notes

There are varying interpretations of what constitutes "Junkyard Physics," and the discussion reflects differing opinions on the necessity of formal education in understanding and teaching physics concepts. Participants express concerns about oversimplification and the potential for misunderstanding.

  • #61
DoggerDan said:
Junkyard physics is fine with me. I understand basic physics well enough, but when you start using all the math, I'm lost.

Pretty much most of my point. I'm sure you can add something to the forums as well.

Welcome.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
The mathematics is not here to confuse you. If one wants to truly understand the forces at work (no pun intended :P), one must understand the mathematics behind it.

For example, in quantum mechanics there are quite a few things that happen that cannot be described by simply using english, and to be precise one must employ math to become specific. However, this math is still abstract, and we are not able to answer the question of why, but rather be able to make very accurate predictions given a particular situation.
 
  • #63
khemist said:
The mathematics is not here to confuse you. If one wants to truly understand the forces at work (no pun intended :P), one must understand the mathematics behind it.

For example, in quantum mechanics there are quite a few things that happen that cannot be described by simply using english, and to be precise one must employ math to become specific. However, this math is still abstract, and we are not able to answer the question of why, but rather be able to make very accurate predictions given a particular situation.

Another equally valid point. I am not trying to discredit the hard work and dedication of those that can understand the math. I'm just trying to see if there is some "middle ground" where "some" people can "translate" complex ideas into "plain English".

If it can't be done then it can't be done. I'm sure that those of us that cannot "do the math" are not going to complain (much), but instead will be delighted when someone can "translate" complex ideas into a more understandable form.

It seems that we all wish to learn to some degree.
 
  • #64
Sorry, this thread was supposed to be closed 3 pages ago. The answer is no. If a member doesn't understand an answer, they can ask a mentor or science advisor to explain it in simpler terms, but honestly there is a limit to how simple you can get and still be carrying the correct meaning. Someone would need to have a high level of understanding in order to do this correctly.
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Should I have studied E&M before learning Optics, Waves & Oscillations
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Help, new physics student looking for advice
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Graduate Could the Laws of Physics Be Proportional to Entropy?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
829
Undergrad Understanding how time derivative = acceleration
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Self Learning Math/Physics
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
3K
High School What Exactly is Conceptual Physics?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Graduate RIP Edwin F Taylor (1931-2025)
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Re-Learn Math for Physics Olympiad
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
High School Which Physics Books Are Best for a Year 9 Student Aiming for MIT?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Other Is a Master's in Physics Enough for a Tenure Track Position?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K