Welcome to Junkyard Physics - Learn & Teach Here!

  • Thread starter Thread starter MrREC
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers around the concept of "Junkyard Physics," a term used by a new member to describe a simplified approach to understanding physics without advanced technical knowledge. Participants emphasize the importance of having a foundational understanding of physics before attempting to teach or explain complex concepts. Notable physicists like Stephen Hawking and Richard Feynman are referenced as examples of those who can distill complex ideas into more accessible formats. The conversation highlights the need for clear communication in physics, especially for those without formal training.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of physics concepts
  • Familiarity with scientific communication
  • Knowledge of notable physicists and their contributions
  • Ability to differentiate between advanced and simplified explanations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Richard Feynman's approach to teaching physics
  • Explore simplified explanations of Einstein's E=mc²
  • Learn about effective science communication techniques
  • Investigate the role of analogies in teaching complex subjects
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for educators, science communicators, and anyone interested in making physics more accessible to a broader audience, particularly those without formal training in the subject.

  • #61
DoggerDan said:
Junkyard physics is fine with me. I understand basic physics well enough, but when you start using all the math, I'm lost.

Pretty much most of my point. I'm sure you can add something to the forums as well.

Welcome.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
The mathematics is not here to confuse you. If one wants to truly understand the forces at work (no pun intended :P), one must understand the mathematics behind it.

For example, in quantum mechanics there are quite a few things that happen that cannot be described by simply using english, and to be precise one must employ math to become specific. However, this math is still abstract, and we are not able to answer the question of why, but rather be able to make very accurate predictions given a particular situation.
 
  • #63
khemist said:
The mathematics is not here to confuse you. If one wants to truly understand the forces at work (no pun intended :P), one must understand the mathematics behind it.

For example, in quantum mechanics there are quite a few things that happen that cannot be described by simply using english, and to be precise one must employ math to become specific. However, this math is still abstract, and we are not able to answer the question of why, but rather be able to make very accurate predictions given a particular situation.

Another equally valid point. I am not trying to discredit the hard work and dedication of those that can understand the math. I'm just trying to see if there is some "middle ground" where "some" people can "translate" complex ideas into "plain English".

If it can't be done then it can't be done. I'm sure that those of us that cannot "do the math" are not going to complain (much), but instead will be delighted when someone can "translate" complex ideas into a more understandable form.

It seems that we all wish to learn to some degree.
 
  • #64
Sorry, this thread was supposed to be closed 3 pages ago. The answer is no. If a member doesn't understand an answer, they can ask a mentor or science advisor to explain it in simpler terms, but honestly there is a limit to how simple you can get and still be carrying the correct meaning. Someone would need to have a high level of understanding in order to do this correctly.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
701
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K