What about this Final Theory thing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Simran737
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Final Theory
Simran737
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
What about this Final Theory thing??

Hi all,

Just was wondering about what you all thought of Mark McCutheson's (sp) book and this expanding universe. That gavity is really the result of, for us here, the Earth expanding as is the whole universe. That to over come "gravity" we must use mechanical means, ie, thrust. Of course we cannot sense this expansion. I have not come to the part about how the heck the Moon stays in orbit with this expansion idea. Any thoughts would be great.

Randy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Simran737 said:
Hi all,
Just was wondering about what you all thought of Mark McCutheson's (sp) book and this expanding universe. That gavity is really the result of, for us here, the Earth expanding as is the whole universe. That to over come "gravity" we must use mechanical means, ie, thrust. Of course we cannot sense this expansion. I have not come to the part about how the heck the Moon stays in orbit with this expansion idea. Any thoughts would be great.
Randy
I started to answer with a basic response about the relative difference between gravity and expansion. The statement "That gavity is really the result of, for us here, the Earth expanding as is the whole universe." stopped me so I checked to see what Mark McCutheson was really about.

Here is a link giving the basics along with correspondence with one of his readers. The reader expressed some very legitimate problems. This is not a link to anything belonging to Mark McCutheson. This individuals expose says more than you can resonable expect here.
http://homepage.mac.com/ruske/ruske/finaltheory.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top