What am I doing wrong? - Telescope Trouble

  • Context: Stargazing 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Felix83
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Telescope
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on troubleshooting image clarity issues with a refractor telescope, specifically when using a Barlow lens. Users identified that removing the Barlow lens improved image quality, suggesting that the Barlow may have been too long or improperly mounted. The conversation also clarified that shorter focal length eyepieces yield higher magnification, but may offer a narrower field of view and less comfort for inexperienced users. Recommendations included using longer focal length eyepieces for better usability, especially in unguided scopes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of refractor telescope mechanics
  • Familiarity with Barlow lenses and their function
  • Knowledge of eyepiece focal lengths and their impact on magnification
  • Basic skills in telescope alignment and adjustment
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specifications and compatibility of Barlow lenses with refractor telescopes
  • Learn about different types of eyepieces and their focal lengths for optimal viewing
  • Explore techniques for aligning and adjusting telescope mirrors
  • Investigate the effects of atmospheric conditions on telescope performance
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy enthusiasts, amateur telescope users, and anyone experiencing image clarity issues with refractor telescopes will benefit from this discussion.

Felix83
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
I decided to dust off my old telescope to see what I could see. I was looking at the moon and messing around, but I could only get a sharp image with the eyepiece removed. Without the eyepiece, I can focus in a good image with my glasses on or off, but with it in it is only a blob of white light. I cleaned it off, but no change. Any Ideas?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It sounds like an alignment problem. Fidget with your mirror adjustment screws and see if that helps.
 
Felix83 said:
I decided to dust off my old telescope to see what I could see. I was looking at the moon and messing around, but I could only get a sharp image with the eyepiece removed. Without the eyepiece, I can focus in a good image with my glasses on or off, but with it in it is only a blob of white light. I cleaned it off, but no change. Any Ideas?
What type of telescope are you using? The fact that you can get a good usable image without an eyepiece inserted suggests that you already have some kind of secondary lens installed in the light-path. Do you have other accessory lenses, such as field-flattener, barlow, compressor?
 
yea there is a barlow x3 before the eyepiece. its a refractor telescope.
 
Felix83 said:
yea there is a barlow x3 before the eyepiece. its a refractor telescope.

is the barlow made to use with that scope??
try removing the barlow and see if you get normal focus with an eyepiece

I suppect the barlow is toooo long to get a good focus with your scope
or is in backwards or other non proper mounting [not all the way in place]
making the distance too long
 
I agree, get rid of the barlow and see if the focuser has enough travel without it.

- Warren
 
I took the barlow out and it works pretty good now. Not a perfect image, but it's cloudy tonight so it seems to be working good. Which eyepieces are for higher magnification - long or short focal length?
 
Felix83 said:
I took the barlow out and it works pretty good now. Not a perfect image, but it's cloudy tonight so it seems to be working good. Which eyepieces are for higher magnification - long or short focal length?
High magnification = short focal length. Shorter-f/l oculars often give you a narrower field of view and less eye relief, so the longer f/l oculars are more comfortable to use, especially with an unguided scope. If you're going to let people look through your 'scope who are not used to using one, you may want to stick to the longer f/l oculars for this reason. Long f/l oculars teamed up with a high-quality Barlow can be a good combo. Often the short f/l oculars bundled w/ commercially-available 'scopes are unrealistically short, delivering magnifications that are unusable, given the small aperture and poor optical quality of the primary.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
8K
  • · Replies 125 ·
5
Replies
125
Views
7K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 226 ·
8
Replies
226
Views
16K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K