What Angle Should a Curve Be Banked to Allow Safe Travel Without Friction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mikefitz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curves
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the banking angle required for a car to safely negotiate a curve without relying on friction, given a coefficient of static friction of 0.84. Participants emphasize the importance of using Newton's second law (F=ma) and centripetal force equations to derive the necessary angle. Key insights include establishing equations for vertical and horizontal forces on a banked curve and recognizing that vertical acceleration remains zero during horizontal motion. The conversation highlights the need for understanding circular motion principles to solve the problem effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law (F=ma)
  • Knowledge of centripetal force and acceleration concepts
  • Familiarity with free body diagrams in physics
  • Basic grasp of circular motion equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to derive the banking angle for curves using centripetal force equations
  • Study the relationship between speed, radius, and centripetal acceleration in circular motion
  • Explore free body diagram techniques for analyzing forces on inclined planes
  • Investigate the effects of varying coefficients of friction on vehicle dynamics in curves
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, automotive engineers, and anyone interested in vehicle dynamics and safety in curved motion.

mikefitz
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
A car can negotiate an unbanked curve safely at a certain maximum speed when the coefficient of static friction between the tires and the ground is 0.84. at what angle should the same curve be banked for the car to negotiate the curve safely at the same maximum speed without relying on friction ?

Honestly, I have no idea where to begin. I can't calculate speed, I don't know the mass of the car, the radius of the curve, anything.

How do I compare the turning angle and speed with a banked curve as opposed to an unbanked curve?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, still trying to figure this one out...

I know I need to use Newton's second law F=ma; but how do I analyze the unbanked curve in x and y directions with only the coefficient of static friction?

Also - does centripetal acceleration change for a banked curve?

thanks!
 
mikefitz said:
A car can negotiate an unbanked curve safely at a certain maximum speed when the coefficient of static friction between the tires and the ground is 0.84. at what angle should the same curve be banked for the car to negotiate the curve safely at the same maximum speed without relying on friction ?

Honestly, I have no idea where to begin. I can't calculate speed, I don't know the mass of the car, the radius of the curve, anything.

How do I compare the turning angle and speed with a banked curve as opposed to an unbanked curve?
Can you work out the (maximum) speed from the first part? All you have to know is the expression for the horizontal force (think circular motion). Since the horizontal force is supplied entirely by friction, you will be able to work out the speed.

Establish the equations for the vertical and horizontal forces on the banked curve (no friction) and that will give you the expression for angle in terms of the car's speed.

[Hint: Do a free body diagram of the car. What is the vertical acceleration (does it accelerate vertically?). What are the forces (as vectors) acting on the car vertically? What is the horizontal acceleration as the car is rounding the curve? What are the forces acting on the car horizontally? ]

AM
 
looking through my notes, I don't have any equations relating to circular motion that include coefficient of static friction in them; this is why I'm having trouble coming up with speed for example. The only equations I have to find the bank angles require speed and radius of the curve...
 
If any of you have additional tips you can pass my way I will check this topic in the morning; again, thanks for your time.
 
mikefitz said:
If any of you have additional tips you can pass my way I will check this topic in the morning; again, thanks for your time.
The horizontal force is supplied by friction. The maximum speed without sliding is determined by the maximum centripetal force that can be supplied by friction:

F_c = \mu_s N = \mu_s mg

That gives you the speed, v (when you used the correct expression for centripetal force).

For the second part, I'll get you started:

\vec N\sin\theta + m\vec g = ? (vertical acceleration)

\vec N\cos\theta = ? (horizontal acceleration)

Solve that for \theta in terms of v and plug in the value of v from the first part.

AM
 
So, the vertical acceleration will have to be zero (since the car isn't actually accelerating upward, just horizontally).

What about the first equation http://img147.imageshack.us/img147/5912/10944360ce2.png - how do you get v from this equation when the variable v isn't part of the equation? also - how am I supposed to substitute a value for m if m isn't given?

sorry for the elementary questions !
 
Last edited by a moderator:
mikefitz said:
So, the vertical acceleration will have to be zero (since the car isn't actually accelerating upward, just horizontally).

What about the first equation http://img147.imageshack.us/img147/5912/10944360ce2.png - how do you get v from this equation when the variable v isn't part of the equation? also - how am I supposed to substitute a value for m if m isn't given.
I said you can work out v from the correct expression for centripetal force. You are supposed to know what that is. What is the centripetal acceleration when an object moves in a curved path or radius R with tangential speed v?

AM
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K