What is Excess Kurtosis and Why is it Important in Financial Analysis?

AI Thread Summary
Excess kurtosis refers to the phenomenon where a distribution has heavier tails than a normal distribution, indicating a higher probability of extreme outcomes. This concept is crucial in financial analysis because many economic variables are incorrectly assumed to follow a normal distribution, leading to significant risks, as evidenced by the collapse of Long-Term Capital Management in 1998. The assumption of Gaussian statistics can result in unforeseen accidents when actual distributions exhibit excess kurtosis and skewness. Understanding these statistical properties is increasingly important in finance to avoid miscalculations and manage risks effectively. The discussion highlights the need for a deeper examination of distribution assumptions in economic modeling.
bballwaterboy
Messages
85
Reaction score
3
I heard a guy mention in a debate that some math calculation didn't obey Gaussian statistics. It was a debate re: the economy (not important here, though).

I was curious what was meant by "Gaussian statistics" and would appreciate if anyone could offer a sort of layman's definition. Thanks so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
He was probably saying that some economic random variable did not have a Normal Distribution. The Normal Distribution is also known as the 'Bell Curve' as well as the 'Gaussian distribution' (because it was first invented by CF Gauss). Many random phenomena are assumed to be Normally Distributed because it makes calculations about them easier. But in some cases that assumption is very inaccurate, and that can cause big, unforeseen accidents.
The collapse of the hedge fund Long-Term Capital Management in 1998 is believed to have arisen from the fund managers assuming that certain economic variables were Normally Distributed when they were not.
 
andrewkirk said:
believed to have arisen from the fund managers assuming that certain economic variables were Normally Distributed when they were not.

I'd be interested in reading more about that, but I didn't see much about it in the wiki.
 
ElijahRockers said:
I'd be interested in reading more about that, but I didn't see much about it in the wiki.
This short article is more helpful, and points to a book by Benoit Mandelbrot all about the danger of the Gaussian assumption.

'Kurtosis' - the fourth moment of the distribution - measures how 'fat' the 'tails' of the distribution are. 'Excess kurtosis' is when there is more probability weight in the tails of a distribution than in a normal distribution with the same first two moments. Excess kurtosis - aka 'fat tails' - along with asymmetry (aka skew - related to the third moment) are problems that get a great deal of attention in finance these days, where it has belatedly been realized that testing the validity of assumptions of normality is very important.
 
  • Like
Likes ElijahRockers
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...

Similar threads

Back
Top