What Are Gödel Propositions and How Are They Derived?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Imparcticle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Godel Theorem
Imparcticle
Messages
572
Reaction score
4
I was just reading about Godel's Theorem. I was unable to grasp the exact meaning of this sentence:

"These propositions, termed Gödel propositions, can be shown to exist by giving a procedure for returning a Gödel proposition from a set of axioms. This procedure forms the basis for proving Gödel's theorem"


from the paragraph:

Using the axioms we can derive propositions about the axioms. Gödel's theorem states that for any given axiomatic system there exists propositions that are either undecidable, or that the axiomatic system is incomplete. These propositions, termed Gödel propositions, can be shown to exist by giving a procedure for returning a Gödel proposition from a set of axioms. This procedure forms the basis for proving Gödel's theorem.

I don't understand what is meant by "..retruning a Godel proposition.."
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
computer speak: just means given the set of axioms there is a method of examining them and then writing down a proposition which is consistent with the axioms, and whose negation is also consistent with the axioms. Meaning if we assume it true there are no contradictions, and if we assume its negation is true there are still no contradictions. Example, the continuum hypothesis and the axioms of ZFC (godel propositions are a little unrealistic; formally they are correct, but practically they aren't propositions you might come across 'naturally')
 
You've probably already heard about or even read it, but I recommend Godel Escher Bach by Douglas H. It was the only layman book I read that broke down Godels argument for me in an understandable fashion. I read it when I was like ten and it still made sense to me, despite my age. That is the sign of a good author, since the idea itself isn't at all intuitive or obvious, especially to a kid.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top