What Are KPOINT Grids and Their Importance in Surface Calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter discoduck
  • Start date Start date
discoduck
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Could somebody explain to me the concepts of KPOINT grids please. I know what k-space/reciprocal space is

What is the difference between an nxnxn grid and a nxnx1 grid for example, and why is it important to use even or odd grids for specific calculations
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The calculation of many quantities in solid state physics require some sort of integral over the Brillouin zone. When doing numerical calculations, these integrals cannot be carried out analytically, so you approximate the integral by using a grid in k-space. This is exactly the same as using, say, the trapezoid rule to integrate a function in one dimension, only we generalize it to a function of two or three dimensions.

An nxnx1 grid only is a single plane of k-points. You would only use this in a case where you have a system which is strongly 2-dimensional (examples might be cuprates and systems like ZrNCl). An even grid is usually best to take advantage of symmetries to speed the computation.
 
What type of grid would I need to use for a surface calculation i.e. bulk structure next to a vacuum?
 
For a surface calculation, you would only use one k=point in the direction of the surface normal. So if your surface is in the x-y plane, then your grid would be NxNx1
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top