MHB What Are Linear Transformations and How Do They Work?

Petrus
Messages
702
Reaction score
0
Hello,
this is something basic I have hard to understand and would like to have help!:)
this is a exemple from My book and I Dont understand the input!
"Let $$T: P_2->P_2$$ be the linear transformation defines by $$T(P(x))=p(2x-1)$$
I Dont understand how this work
$$T(1)=1, T(x)=2x-1, T(x^2)=(2x-1)^2$$
Edit: if i think correct they think like this $$T(1)=T(x^0)=(2x-1)^0=1$$
Regards,
$$|\pi\rangle$$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Petrus said:
Hello,
this is something basic I have hard to understand and would like to have help!:)
this is a exemple from My book and I Dont understand the input!
"Let $$T: P_2->P_2$$ be the linear transformation defines by $$T(P(x))=p(2x-1)$$
I Dont understand how this work
$$T(1)=1, T(x)=2x-1, T(x^2)=(2x-1)^2$$

Regards,
$$|\pi\rangle$$

Hi Petrus!

I suspect that should be $$T(P(x))=P(2x-1)$$.

If so, then for your first example, you would have P(x)=1.
So T(P(x)) = T(1).
And P(2x-1) = 1.
Therefore T(1) = 1.

In the second example, you would have P(x)=x.
So T(P(x)) = T(x).
And P(2x-1)=2x-1.
Therefore T(x) = 2x-1.

In the third example. you would have $P(x)=x^2$.
So $T(P(x)) = T(x^2)$.
And $P(2x-1) = (2x-1)^2$.
Therefore $T(x^2) = (2x-1)^2$.
 
I like Serena said:
Hi Petrus!

I suspect that should be $$T(P(x))=P(2x-1)$$.

If so, then for your first example, you would have P(x)=1.
So T(P(x)) = T(1).
And P(2x-1) = 1.
Therefore T(1) = 1.

In the second example, you would have P(x)=x.
So T(P(x)) = T(x).
And P(2x-1)=2x-1.
Therefore T(x) = 2x-1.

In the third example. you would have $P(x)=x^2$.
So $T(P(x)) = T(x^2)$.
And $P(2x-1) = (2x-1)^2$.
Therefore $T(x^2) = (2x-1)^2$.
Thank you! Evrything is clear now! Have a nice day!:)
By the way your suspect is correct!;)
Regards,
$$|\pi\rangle$$
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...

Similar threads

Back
Top