What Are Phonons and How Do They Influence Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter secret2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basics Phonons
secret2
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
I have never encountered phonon before, so I am going to make a list of statements, and please be generous to point out any mistakes. Thank you.

1. There is no new physics behind the idea of phonons: it is just an alternative way of doing things.

2. When one says that there are, say, 5 phonons, it can be one of the following case: one atom oscillating with 5(h bar)w, 2 atoms with a sum of 5(h bar)w, and so on.

3. Propagation of phonons means nothing more than the exchange of energy between oscillators.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
secret2 said:
I have never encountered phonon before, so I am going to make a list of statements, and please be generous to point out any mistakes. Thank you.

1. There is no new physics behind the idea of phonons: it is just an alternative way of doing things.
What do you mean here ? Phonons are the QM-interpretation of energy-values. The atoms in a lattice can vibrate and this motion is expressed in terms of oscillators. A phonon is nothing else then an energy-quantum of such oscillators, just like the photon is an energy-quantum of EM-radiation (eg light)

2. When one says that there are, say, 5 phonons, it can be one of the following case: one atom oscillating with 5(h bar)w, 2 atoms with a sum of 5(h bar)w, and so on.

yes indeed. The phonon is ONE energyquantum E_{n} = (n + \frac{1}{2}) \hbar \omega
But beware that two harmonic oscillators will have an influence on each other's energy-levels. This is due to their mutual interaction.

3. Propagation of phonons means nothing more than the exchange of energy between oscillators.

Yes, when a phonon is absorbed by an oscillator, this oscillator is in a higher energy-state. to lower the energy, just emit a phonon.

regards
marlon
 
secret2 said:
2. When one says that there are, say, 5 phonons, it can be one of the following case: one atom oscillating with 5(h bar)w, 2 atoms with a sum of 5(h bar)w, and so on.

3. Propagation of phonons means nothing more than the exchange of energy between oscillators.
Phonons are not single atoms oscillating. Phonons are excitations of the normal modes of a crystal, which in principle is of infinite size (no surfaces). Some phonons have very long wavelengths - in a truly infinite crystal there are phonons with frequencies in the audio range and wavelength of many meters.

Propagation should the same as propagation of a classical wave on a string.
 
secret2 said:
I have never encountered phonon before, so I am going to make a list of statements, and please be generous to point out any mistakes. Thank you.

1. There is no new physics behind the idea of phonons: it is just an alternative way of doing things.

Nope. The "other" way of doing this does not contain the same set of information. Once one invokes phonons, then all (and I mean ALL) the rules of QFT comes in. This includes the self-energy terms that reveal themselves via the perturbative expansion. You do not get, for example, the strong and weak coupling description of superconductivity using the "other" description.

2. When one says that there are, say, 5 phonons, it can be one of the following case: one atom oscillating with 5(h bar)w, 2 atoms with a sum of 5(h bar)w, and so on.

5 \hbar \omega is NOT 5 phonons. If you must equate the two different pictures, phonons are the normal modes of oscillations.

3. Propagation of phonons means nothing more than the exchange of energy between oscillators.

You left out momentum and spin (even though phonons have spin of zero). It's hard to know what you mean by "propagation" here. Phonons (and any other QFT particles) are exchange particles that carry energy, momentum and spin. They don't really "propagate". They are the replacement of the classical field. However, their formalism (QFT) provides MORE fundamental information than the classical field formalism. In that sense, they are not necessarily simply an "alternative" description.

Zz.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top