What Are Some Basic Books on Physics for a Newbie in College?

  • Thread starter Thread starter J-ho
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basics Complete
AI Thread Summary
For beginners in college looking to learn physics, taking a class is highly recommended as it provides structured learning. Basic physics books suggested include Hewitt's "Conceptual Physics," which focuses on understanding concepts with minimal math, and Serway's book, although it may be advanced for those without prior physics or calculus knowledge. It's advised to study basic mechanics before delving into thermodynamics. Keeping up with math skills is crucial for success in physics. Exploring evening classes or auditing a course can be beneficial for hands-on experience.
J-ho
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I'm looking for a very basic book on physics,basically starting from scratch. I'm in college right now taking policing but I'm kind of having a change of heart. Any books geared towards marine engineering or navigation would be useful too.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd simply suggest taking a physics class, that will be the best way to learn the basics. Any basic book on physics would be ok, though it really depends on what you're trying to learn. To USE physics requires learning lots of math and equations and such. To UNDERSTAND physics generally doesn't.
 
Thanks bro, I'm going to call up the college and see if I can take evening classes in physics or calculus..Still looking for some books on basic physics or thermodynamics..
 
Serway's book is very good but might be a little too "advanced" if you didn't take physics/calc in high school.

If you want to check out physics just sit into a class, that way you don't have to pay for it. I would also study basic mechanics before attempting to look into thermodynamics. Also keep up with maths, that is the no.1 rule of success.
 
If you've had very little math, I suggest Hewitt's "Conceptual Physics." It's a popular textbook for classes that (try to) teach physics with a minimum of math.
 
Thanks guys..I'll def check that book out
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top